What's New In The File Library
Member Submitted Reviews
Bargain Hunters Forum
Classified, Want, Swap Ads
Community Links Library
FS9, FSX & P3D CTD Guide (v2)
FSX / P3D Configuration Guide
Simulation's Premier Resource!
AVSIM is a free service to the flight and simulation communities. Please help us keep it that way. Donate what you can today! Thank you for your support!
- Palo Alto -25%
- Anyone seen any good Labor Day sales for Flight SIm 2015?
- San Diego Lindbergh International Airport 40% off
- DCS flash sale - 70% off at their shop
- REX 50% Off September Sale
- Pisa X San Giusto Airport 20% OFF for 24h at SimPlanet
- Rise of flight sale on steam
- REX 5 days 50 people 50% off contest
- Thai Creations 50% off sale
- FlightsimTools.com 3 for 2 deal
- Saitek Radio & Multi panel
- Selling My 737 Gear :(
- job for developers
- MSI GTX 980 4GB OC Editon. $400
- MSI N550GTX-TI
- GoFlight GF-TQ6 Throttle Quadrant on Ebay(UK)
- For Sale:GOFLIGHT GF-TQ6 Throttle Quadrant
- (2) EVGA GTX970 SC For Sale. Never overclocked, ready to go
- Boeing Style handles / Levers set for Saitek throttle quadrant
- UK Only - Saitek Cessna Yoke and addtional Throttle Quadrant
. . .
Where is Waypoint W015
8 replies to this topic
Posted 05 February 2012 - 05:20 PM
I presume all the possible latitude/longitude combinations necessary for oceanic crossings would be in the database. I had already searched the wpnavfix.txt file and there is no W015 but there is a full range of 6xxxN fixes. As the NavData shown on the Virgin 747 CDU is dated October - November 2000, is it possible that W015 has been obsoleted? Recent VatSim routes don't show anything between waypoints RATSU (61N, 10W) and 6520N.
Posted 05 February 2012 - 05:46 PM
W015 sounds like an airway in the UK. Bill Bridges
Does anyone have information about waypoint W015 in the North Atlantic? I think it may be the same as 6215N. It is shown in the ITVV video of Virgin Atlantic flight EGLL to KSFO and somewhere between RIBEL and 6520N.
"Don't Fly Tired, Don't Fly Sick, Always Fly Safe"
Posted 05 February 2012 - 06:00 PM
That naming convention is wrong for a primary waypoint. Primary waypoints are named with five characters ending in a letter [a~z]. VORs and NDB's are named with three characters, again ending with a letter. This is necessary so the FMC can create derived waypoints by appending a bearing (in digits) to the end of a primary waypoint, which never ends in a digit.Are you certain they were not talking about an airway?
Posted 06 February 2012 - 12:34 PM
If you look at the track and distance, W015 is approx on 153°, 178NM from 6520N. Which corresponds almost perfectly with 6315N. Maybe W015 is just a special name in Virgin's 744's fixes database for 6315N. It may also be a custom waypoint, created for this flight.
Specs : i7920@4,1GHZ, Asus Rampage II Extreme, MSI GTX560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC, 6Go RAM OCZ, Corsair HX850, Coolermaster Storm Sniper Black Mesh, Noctua NH-D14
Posted 06 February 2012 - 05:56 PM
I wondered if W015 could be a custom waypoint but, if it is the same as 6315N, why not just use 6315N? The only thing is the Virgin database is dated October 5 - November 2, 2000, whereas mine is dated July 28 - August 24, 2011. I suppose I could try asking Virgin Atlantic.