What's better....

[lostmoon 0]

(sorry if this has been asked already)DB Walk & Follow or Active Camera? is one particularly easier to use than the other? more or less features than the other?thanks.TOmx

[johndrago 4]

>(sorry if this has been asked already)>>DB Walk & Follow or Active Camera? is one particularly easier>to use than the other? more or less features than the other?>>thanks.>TOmxI use W&F, and like it a lot. It provides nice wing views for the 747, and allows me to do plane spotting, not to mention get great screenshots. I have not used Active camera, other than the demo, but from what I hear, it's a good product also.- John

[Guest Petervan]

W&F : excellent for external view (spot plane view)Active Camera : excellent for internal view (virtual cockpit)if you can afford both utilities don't hesitate to spend some dollars, you won't regret it.Peter Van Stichel

[lostmoon 0]

thanks peter. how do the modules cooperate with each other when installed on the same machine? any conflicts with key commands?tom

[Guest kame]

>W&F : excellent for external view (spot plane view)>Active Camera : excellent for internal view (virtual cockpit)>>Peter Van StichelI quite agree with him and I'm also using so them.Sincerely,Kan-ichiro Fushihara

[Guest andyman]

Remove DBS Cockpit walk gauge from your modules folder, because that would be like a VC walk program, which active cam is soley about.