X800 Pro Oss Gatwick/RFP repaint/ VFR scenery

[Guest nitram]

This is my first repaint of RFP. I can't upload her as see has the wrong engines for this aircraft and RFP do not allow incorrect repaints. TF-ABP has RR engines!It is just that I will flying on her to Orlando next year.Just enjoy:Spotters O8Rhttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/87545.jpgV2http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/87541.jpgV2http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/87542.jpgRecognise this Gatwick landmark?http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/87543.jpgA25 M25 Junction just below right wing.http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/87544.jpgRegards Nitram

[Guest adria320]

Lovely paint :) Just zoom in more next time and the shots'll turn out better :)

[Guest nitram]

>Lovely paint :) Just zoom in more next time and the shots'll>turn out better :)Sorry, I was more inerested in the views!;)

[michal 44]

But your frames (fps) are not that great - at least in the first pics - and I wonder why - scenery or weather is pretty benign.Michael J.http://www.reality-xp.com/community/nr/rsc/rxp-higher.jpg

[Guest DJPrev]

Nice shots fella :D!!Looks like we got some mo' UK simmers up in here, eh :-kewl? :-hahL8RZ!

DJ PREV

http://smileyonline.free.fr/images/gif/gra...therock_gif.gif

[Guest nitram]

>But your frames (fps) are not that great - at least in the>first pics - and I wonder why - scenery or weather is pretty>benign.>>Michael J.>http://www.reality-xp.com/community/nr/rsc/rxp-higher.jpgThat is because of RFP Paint (I need to resize the extenal textures DXTbmp), OSS Scenery, VFR Scenery, traffic 100% and real weather updates. I also have the VFR scenery textures set to massive.It was and always will hit frame rates in this airport. Try it on your set up. If you get above 5 FPS, buy yourself a drink!After take off I am getting 35-60 FPS. Just look how clear the scenery is, the hills mesh and no shimmers or blurries. Just look at the radio masts on the hills in picture 3, some 50 miles away! (ANO scenery download here. Thanks Guys). Also the controls are super responsive even on the ground. Taxing is now controllable via extremely small throttle inputs. FPS so what? I have the card and as far as I am concerned it is the Dogs Nadgers!:-ukliamhttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/87547.jpg

[michal 44]

>Just look how clear the>scenery is, the hills mesh and no shimmers or blurriesIt is indeed. I admit I am a dummy who knows nothing about RFP ;-)Michael J.http://www.reality-xp.com/community/nr/rsc/rxp-higher.jpg

[Quaere Verum 42]

Great Pictures Nitram.As a "local" I'd say the Gatwick landmark is the all weather racecourse at Lingfield Park.Excellent choice of graphics card, PCPro magazine did a review this month and the MSI version came out with top marks.

[Guest nitram]

Terry I have been so busy repainting that I completely missed that it was lingfield, Duh! I even took my dad there racing. The card is brilliant with the amd 2Ghz 64 bit chip.Theres aguy in this screenshots forum with a water cooled 4Ghz rig. The poor soul is only getting 25FPS (poor man!)http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...id=154564&page=Regards Nitram (Martin)

[michal 44]

>The poor soul is only getting 25FPS (poor man!)Yeah, but he has got it locked at 25 fps. Lets stick to the facts and avoid hasty statements.Michael J.

[Guest nitram]

>>>>The poor soul is only getting 25FPS (poor man!)>>Yeah, but he has got it locked at 25 fps. Lets stick to the>facts and avoid hasty statements.>>Michael J.> And I would like to see the proof first! Go here for mine:http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...d=153755&page=4If you lock FS9 at a set FPS, it has a habit of reducing Quality and speed in order to keep up with desired FPS.My frames are set to Unlimited. At least my FPS may drop slightly, but I am getting a Smooth, blur free sim.I would rather get my aircraft flying properly and realistcally than fret over frame rates.Plus my system is unclocked, probably cheaper and does not leak!:-lol

[Guest ChkSix]

Dude how old are you, 15?1: None of your shots here are spectacular, and the last one showing 33FPS is nothing but an aircraft zoomed in beyond 1.00x blurring the entire ground.2: Anytime you do get 50FPS, there is no extreme weather density or high traffic volume in the pic, but I am sure others have noticed the same thing (who are you fooling with this gibberish?). When there is (as near the ground during takeoff), you are getting 'teen range' FPS, nothing as amazing as you are trying to make it out to be, CONSIDERING your autogen consists of 5 trees and nothing more on the VFR scenery around the airport ONLY. LMAO! Didn't think I would recognize it for what it is? I don't get any 'stutters' (hence, abrupt change in FPS), but try again since so far you're batting 0.000 basing your comments on NO PICS I have shared OR taken thus far of FS9 with the new system. 3: If I unlock my FPS(which btw in my post, I said "TEST RUN" in case you're blind, which is why they were LOCKED), I easily get over 80 airborne and 30 on the ground with full 100% UT traffic and everything maxed (including Autogen..cough seems missing in yours?), and not in Kansas, but the big Class B airports. I'll show you that tomorrow instead of yapping away like someone in need of a higher paxil dosage. 4: You must have something to prove or are jealous of something because your ill comments have gone from one thread to another with no provocation except for me just sharing amongst my friends a few pics of my newly completed setup which again, has YET to take one complete flight in FS9.5: When I do take screenshots tomorrow, you will definitely want to hesitate the next time before commenting so quickly or boasting against me in the future. If your theory on CPU's, overstressing, and invalidation is any indication, you are someone full of no facts and nothing but hot, clueless air. Is this guy new? Who gets blurry textures here? LOL! He must not know me or my posts too well. I got a whole album on Webshots with zero blurries, and those were all taken on the 5950, pre-6800Ultra.Someone tell this kid to lay the pipe down, and to go watch some Sesame Street or Teletubbies please. He insults me with absolutely no facts, makes statements like he thinks he knows what he is talking about (good thing some of us are educated), and then calls me a poor soul because I ran flight sim once since build completion (AS A TEST), and I only slewed to altitude for 5 minutes? Forget the TV, let's get him hooked on phonics!How are you comparing an X800pro to an Ultra anyway, by sniffing chalkdust? Don't you know that that's the job of the XT, not the X800pro; the 12 pipeline, trilinear algorithm, R300core (same one from the TWO YEARD OLD 9700pro mind you) engine that almost could but gets killed in almost every benchmark and resolution by the 6800GT (go look at the latest reviews from Firing Squad to Xbit to Anandtech), the Ultra's little brother? I mean know your facts please before commenting, it helps you not look like such a jackass! This is the second time I am educating you on the facts tonight. The third one will cost you money. I just figured out the reason to all your boasting and taunting. If I would have noticed earlier, I would have written you off totally without saying three words since you are completely lost. You are an ATI a really excited user, and that's what started this all. Throughout both posts, you began with your initial snide remarks (someone said petty, and I concluded shooting holes in your uneducated posts with the facts) to me in my thread when all I posted was new computer shots and absolutely nothing more. Do yourself a favor, go to the HardOCP or Driverheaven Forums for that since that is usually where the children with no brains hangout. We are a group of people here in love with flight simming and aviation, not arguing or bickering over who has what card or anything else immature. That's the argument of the weak and ignorant with little education, and has no place here on these forums whatsoever.Grow up, finish high school, and don't believe the sky is blue just because someone tells you it is. KNOW for yourself why it is.

[Guest BodoM]

I can't upload her as see has the wrong engines for this aircraft and RFP do not allow incorrect repaints. TF-ABP has RR engines!That is absolute nonsense! Our rules say that User Repaints have to be posted at the User Repaint Section at www.panelshop.com only. We did not say that we do not allow "fictional paints". The Alitalia BVLGARI is a "fictional sheme" as it used GE engines and we posted it anyways. So where is your problem?You can send me the files and I will prepare them for the User Repaints section.___________________________Best Regards,Bodo M

[Guest ChkSix]

Since I'm playing the role as educator now, look at this.http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/dis...ds-2004_40.htmlShows all 6800's ahead of the X800 series in Flight Sim, now doesn't it? See how important it is to know the facts?? By the way, unlike the x800 which uses an impossible to change on the user end algorithm (optimization) in the control panel, the 6800 looses in highest resolution by a mere 4fps because of that. That's why ATi is hesitant to allow the end user to change it freely. Because when the optimization is turned off (only way right now is via registry), all X800's take a 20% performance hit, putting them on par with the 9800 series clock for clock. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=16473 (look at the English Translation)Mike :-waveP4 3.2E @4.00ghz 250FSBAsus P4C800 Deluxe Rev 1017 1gb Corsair XMS PC3500 2-3-3-6 @2.75vNvidia BFG 6800 Ultra OCSB Audigy2 Platinum ExSony CPD-G520 21' MonitorLiquid Cooled GoodnessPics: http://community.webshots.com/user/chksix2002

[MrHoward 7]

Me thinks ye need to take a dose of yer own perscription there matey.Getting WAY to upset over... umm... nothing. It's just a screenshot. Nothing to have a coronary over. Not to mention his initial post didn't even mention you at all. Was only after someone else started 'picking' that things got out of hand.Did I misread the sign on the door - thought maybe I'd wandered into Counter strike land or something... Gotta love virtual testosterone. :-roll