Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

HiAs we know FS9 only uses one core of a dual core processer, even if I have both on by default. Given this fact would the best PC for playing FS2004 be a singhle core, like a Intel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,Go for dual/quad core. Even though you might not benefit much from it in FS9 (only slightly by other processes), FSX supports up to 4 cores.Also other games and applications may/will benefit from dual/quad core processors.Basically it's a no brainer as far as I'm concerned.


Location: Vleuten, The Netherlands, 15.7dme EHAM
System: AMD 7800X3D - X670 Mobo - RTX 4090 - 32GB 6000MHz DDR5 - Corsair RM1000x PSU - 2 x 2TB SSD - 32" 1440p Display - Windows 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest neiljay66

dual core definitely. fs9 may not take advantage of the second processor, but the CORE architecture is a faster and more efficient architecture, Period. Do not buy a p4 processor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you might be able to improve FS9 a bit more with a dual/quad core if you use other programs like ActiveSky, FS Flightkeeper, and other FS addons that have external programs running outside FS... By forcing the external addons to run on a separate core from FS9, those apps won't be taking cpu time away from FS9... :)


StoneC0ld_zps439869f4.png

Declared weather:  FSX: ASN / FS9: ASE

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the input, I already am running on a E6400, 2G RAM,ASUS P5BW-LA mATM, 7600GT 1400X900X32. I find at heathrow EGLL, fps is lowest at around 44, on loading LDS767 down to 31 (2D cockpit). This without any anti.. anything on, no changes to FS9.cfg (all the changes I have read about never seem to do anything and maybe a little negative. All display setting for me is HIGH and traffic set to 80%.It is good, I can lock fps at 30 and fly anywhere no issues only a few stutters at ground at heathrow.From what I read, people are having things maxed out, put anti.. everything on, use traffic add-on s/w, other s/w and at around 30 fps. I have 2 options, upgrade my compaq PC : change 300W psu for a 430/500w, change gpu to 7950GT at see.Else start again and built a totally new gaming PC.But then I have also seen there poeple with top of the range PC's having very poor fps, < 10fps!!!, so it all is confusing, but I think dual core is the way to go.It is just given what I read, people think FS9 is more CPU dependant than GPU.regardskrishan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how, but there is a hack to use dual core in FS9.


Regards,

BoeingGuy

 

customer.jpg

ASUS P5E X38 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.2 GHz on 1600 MHz FSB (400x8) | 4 GB DDR2-800 RAM | EVGA GeForce 8800 GT Superclocked @ 679/979 | 320 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 RPM HD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...