PSS and IFDG

[Guest Northy]

Hi,Sorry if this has been covered before as I'm sure it has somewhere....I've just re-installed my PSS airbus's after a year of being off my hard drive,I'm just curious to know if I'll get any better performance if I use the IFDG model merged with the PSS panel?Also there seems to be far more repaints around for the IFDG plane than the PSS version.Thanks,Regards,Martin.

[Johan_Dees 84]

As long as you stay in the cockpit it doesnt matter.. but:Remember that the COG reference point is taken from the MDL, fde and panel are designed to work with that.Why should you? you will lose the VC.JohanA LITTLE LESS CONVERSATION, AND A LITTLE MORE ACTION PLEASE

[Bob Scott 7,716]

Yes, IMHO the PSS panel merged with iFDG models and iFDG A319 and A321 FDE written by Eugene Schneider, or the A320 FDE written by Pedro Oliveira, perform far batter than the PSS stock models and FDE.And affirmative also on the larger free repaint pool.RegardsBob ScottATP IMEL Gulfstream II-III-IV-V L-300Santiago de Chile

[Johan_Dees 84]

Eh.. Bob... umm..JohanA LITTLE LESS CONVERSATION, AND A LITTLE MORE ACTION PLEASE.."The chances of anything coming from Mars are a million to one - but they stillcome!"Ulla!

[boshar 6]

>As long as you stay in the cockpit it doesnt matter.. but:>>Remember that the COG reference point is taken from the MDL,>fde and panel are designed to work with that.>>Why should you? you will lose the VC.>>Johan>>A LITTLE LESS CONVERSATION, AND A LITTLE MORE ACTION PLEASEBut you gain a beter outside model that doesn't have its stabilator at a weird angle during level flight (in FS9). The 3rd party FDE's give it beter (more real) performance and although there is no VC the PSS VC was 'just' a FS2002 standard affair with little (if any) features. Just add some 2d sideviews and you still have the best possible FS9 bus.

[Bob Scott 7,716]

>Eh.. Bob... umm..Errr... Johan... huh???Bob ScottATP IMEL Gulfstream II-III-IV-V L-300Santiago de Chile