Larry has done nothing more than prove FS9 is better. Crappy shots and he even has to try to slip a real world shot in trying to pass it off as FSX. What a joke you have made.

>Larry has done nothing more than prove FS9 is better. Crappy>shots and he even has to try to slip a real world shot in>trying to pass it off as FSX. What a joke you have made. In the first place, I never tried to pass it off as FSX. Did I label it as FSX? If it was, EVERBODY would being switching to FSX! :-lol As to FS9 & FSX, one or the other is truly the better sim, depending on purpose. And I don't deny that; which is why I continue to use both. A reasonable person of sound mind, would soon realize that...:7Pssst...... even X-Plane has it's place...L.Adamson

That's kind of meaningless. What and where were you flying? What are your settings? How much autogen?

Very true. That is why contrary to what some developers think, FSX will never be what FS9 currently is. We can ALL hope ACES learned its lesson with this FSX debacle and makes FS11 the next FS9 so to speak.

carrotroot - I was able to enjoy FS9 the first week it came out. As an airliner fan, I was able to explore FS9 with ADD-ON AIRLINERS, real weather and 3rd party AI as well, the first week it came out. Sure we had to tweak. I have never seen a version of MSFS that was esentially unusable to the average user, right out of the box. After 6 months, things should be calming down, performance wise, and we should be looking forward to new 3-rd party add-ons. ....HARDLY.http://www.my-buddy-icon.com/Icons/objects/red_3d_plane.gifAlex ChristoffN562ZBaltimore, MD