Jeppesen vs Navigraph charts

[Guest receptor99]

Hello everyone,This question may seem basic. I tried looking for an answer on the forum (admittedly not an exhaustive search) and on the internet, but wasn't able to find an answer.I have been using Jeppesen 3.0 and Navigraph charts for the 747-400 PMDG (in FS2004). Waypoints from both charts can be entered into the FMC, but they are different for the same runway.For example, landing at OEJN 34 C with Jeppesen charts goes through the sequence tavni --> ALNON --> JDW70 -- > JDW 22 --> 34 Cwhile Navigraph charts go through Tavni-->Nadov-->Sokit-->IJDW-->34CWhat is the difference between the two charts? Is one better than the other?Thanks in advance for everyone's responseTabraiz

[Guest receptor99]

Any thoughts? I guess I am even wondering if there is a general difference between Jeppesen Simcharts vs Navigraph charts, and if so which one would be recommendedThanks again,tabraiz

[Egbert Drenth 250]

>Any thoughts? I guess I am even wondering if there is a>general difference between Jeppesen Simcharts vs Navigraph>charts, and if so which one would be recommended>>Thanks again,>>tabraizThe Jeppesen charts are not updated and are in sync with the default Fs2004 scenery, whereas the Navigraph charts are updated every 6 months (or maybe every 3 months)The choice depends on if you are flying a lot online (requiring up-to-date FMC navdata and charts) or if you are flying offline in the default scenery.Personally I like Navigraph much better, but they are a bit more expensive.

[Guest receptor99]

Thanks, I really appreciate the response.tabraiz