Walk and Follow or Active Camera?

[Guest Weeman]

Just wanted to here some opinions about the two products...I have used active camera and i have seen what IGFly's Walk and Follow can do but which one is really better..I have Active Camera now. Should i switch over to Walk and Follow?

[Jure 36]

I have both and I prefer Active Camera. A lot. Uninstalled W&F and recently installed it again, but it just doesn't cut it for me. You can have both installed, though. W&F has some neat features but lacks a few that I find important and which AC has. So, if I had to choose between the two, I'd choose Active Camera.Regards,Jure

[dfish 1]

I used AC until WaF came out now I use it because you can create wing views for aircraft without virtual cabins. WF allows you to move the camera anywere in spot view, as a matter of fact FSX has that option two. IMHO, get WF.Dave F.

[Guest Coneman]

I was considering W&F as well, but found that the Recorder Module by Matthias Neusinger gave me what I was looking for, one of which was the spot views that FSX has of the aircraft.Cheers

[duckbilled 310]

I don't have w&f but I really like the head latency included with ac.

[edetroit 933]

I have tried W&F and AC. The only one I use is AC for head latency and wing views (if poss)The freeware Recorder module covers all my wing/spot/tower view needs.

regardsEdaka Capt. P[/font color]i[/font color]c[/font color]a[/font color]s[/font color]s[/font color]o[/font color]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v640/edetroit100/Ed3.jpgMy FS9 Videos] AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1024Mb PC3200 DDR, 300Gb HD 256Mb DDR Nvidia 7800 GTX PCI-E, Audigy 2 ZSViewsonic VP2130b 21.3" LCD[/font color

[virtualstuff 758]

Yep same here flight recorder + ac great combo :-)Andr

[StamPilot 4]

W&F is enough for me in FS.