FS9 Orlando Intl

[Guest CHRISH]

Just wondering if there is a good KMCO Orlando Intl Airport out there either payware or freeware for FS9. I tried the Simflyers version but the FPS are terrible on my high end spec machine.They drop from 60 to around 20 !Best Regards,ChrisEGBB

[edetroit 933]

Not that I know of. :( Orlando Sanford Intl (SFB) is also an airport I'd like to see in FS9. :)

regardsEdaka Capt. P[/font color]i[/font color]c[/font color]a[/font color]s[/font color]s[/font color]o[/font color]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v640/edetroit100/Ed3.jpgMy FS9 Videos] AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 1024Mb PC3200 DDR, 300Gb HD 256Mb DDR Nvidia 7800 GTX PCI-E, Audigy 2 ZSViewsonic VP2130b 21.3" LCD[/font color

[kparrish1 0]

I use the Cloud9 kmco. It is payware but looks good and has good fps. It also works in fsx. keith

[Mike... 7]

Um, Cloud9's KMCO is an FSX only airport... And even after a barrage of requests, they will not make an FS9 compatible version.If you are using it in FS9, I think you owe us some screen shots.As for KMCO, I don't think 20 FPS is bad, it's flyable. BluePrint will do KMCO by the way. Mach 1 is considering it, but then you will have to do some serious voting, see the thread around here somewhere.

[ubersu 78]

You might try the WTS freeware version - it looks good and isn't as big a framerate hog as the Simflyers version. I believe it's in the AVSIM library.DJ

[Silverbird 115]

>Um, Cloud9's KMCO is an FSX only airport... And even after a>barrage of requests, they will not make an FS9 compatible>version.>>If you are using it in FS9, I think you owe us some screen>shots.>>As for KMCO, I don't think 20 FPS is bad, it's flyable.>BluePrint will do KMCO by the way. Mach 1 is considering it,>but then you will have to do some serious voting, see the>thread around here somewhere.Like Mike mentioned the only one making kmco for fs9 so far is blueprint http://www.blueprintsimulations.com/ it really sucks that cloud9 never updated kmcos ground texture for fsx and made a fs9 version that would have been great.

[scottb613 1,188]

Yep - agree - try WatsUp...http://www.freewebs.com/foou707/index.htmThey are pretty good freeware models and good enough for me...They are frame rate friendly and Brandon has even sent me some mods for my own personal tastes...I use them quite often...Highly recommend taking a look...Regards,Scott

[Guest M1DG Jaxan]

I dunno, I'm pretty partial to this one... http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/1766/ssstip4.gifhttp://img295.imageshack.us/img295/6441/screenshot222iq0.jpghttp://img233.imageshack.us/img233/9676/screenshot228ks7.jpghttp://img131.imageshack.us/img131/3010/screenshot223rl3.jpg

[Old Bill 0]

Hello Mach One, I went to your web site and could not find KMCO. It says KFLL is 45% complete. When can we expect that one.Bill, Florida Flyer

[ubersu 78]

Isn't that the airport that is super-secret? Won't get hopes up, but it sure looks nice!DJ

[Chuck_B 2]

Oh, man, that just is NOT fair -- showing those screen shots and not being able to get that.Looks gorgeous -- I love KMCO. I have family in Orlando and I've been flying in and out of the real airport for years. Given the popularity of the area for tourists, it's hard to believe that there's never been a better FS9 version developed. VERY frustrating.

[rhodges 6]

SimFlyers had one which I still use along with several of their other airports, but highly outdated by today's standards and I don't think it is still available.Good luck:RTH

[Guest M1DG Jaxan]

>Oh, man, that just is NOT fair -- showing those screen shots>and not being able to get that.I'm not that cruel.

[Chuck_B 2]

I don't know, man. That seems pretty cruel! :-lol

[ubersu 78]

You are such a tease! :-) DJ