July 1, 200322 yr I agree with Kyle.The GPS is much improved and showed no signs of being resource hungry on my paltry AMD700. I like it a lot better than the old GPS. I think you will too.KJhttp://fsgateway.com/frank/fs9paibeta.jpg
July 1, 200322 yr "The GPS is much improved and showed no signs of being resource hungry on my paltry AMD700. I like it a lot better than the old GPS. I think you will too."I agree it is far better than FS2002's GPS. I think I could launch a forum on the new GPS alone :)
July 1, 200322 yr Jon,That's a very good statement. I've honed my FS for speed--any degradation from the GPS is going to be noticed more, as I fly often with Autogen off and AI off, and I've set a high target fps of 25. What I do find, is if I enable Autogen and the GPS is online, it doesn't take even more off of the performance. For lack of a better word, it seems to take what it takes, and it leaves system performance alone outside of that. And as I noted, when it is in the background, there is no performance penalty regardless of what type of flying I've set up my system for.-John
July 1, 200322 yr John,You're correct with that statement. With all the added goodies on the GPS, some people will certainly need some ground school to get them up to speed. :-)KJhttp://fsgateway.com/frank/fs9paibeta.jpg
Create an account or sign in to comment