Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have an 8800GTS 320mb running FS2004, which is okay, but could be better compared to some videos I've seen.I have an opportunity to get an 8800GTX 768mb for a great price.Would it be worth it, will I see a big difference


Lyn the trucker

FSX - XP11 - MSFS         Ryzen 5900x - Asus X570 VIII Hero - RTX 4090 - G.SKILL Trident 32 GB DDR4 - WD SN750 M2 1TB + Samsung SSD 250GB - HP Reverb G2 - Win 10/64

 


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have an 8800GTS 320mb running FS2004, which is okay, but could be better compared to some videos I've seen.I have an opportunity to get an 8800GTX 768mb for a great price.Would it be worth it, will I see a big difference
Given that FS9 is a 95% driven CPU application, I don't believe you'll see much difference.From my own experience, on my previous rig (AMD FX-60), at one time I upgraded from a GeForce 7600GS 256MB Silent to a 8800GT 512MB and to tell you the truth; it wasn't the earth shatering experience I was hoping for. It gave me less than 10% fps increase and only marginal better image quality.

Regards,

Frank van der Werff

Banner_FS2Crew_Line_Pilot.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Given that FS9 is a 95% driven CPU application, I don't believe you'll see much difference.From my own experience, on my previous rig (AMD FX-60), at one time I upgraded from a GeForce 7600GS 256MB Silent to a 8800GT 512MB and to tell you the truth; it wasn't the earth shatering experience I was hoping for. It gave me less than 10% fps increase and only marginal better image quality.
Something is wrong with your config to only receive a 10% quantitative difference in performance moving from a 7600 GS to an 8800 GT. Unless you run really low graphics settings, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Something is wrong with your config to only receive a 10% quantitative difference in performance moving from a 7600 GS to an 8800 GT. Unless you run really low graphics settings, of course.
That's what I've always thought, but I've never been able to figure out what the exact problem was. With other games I saw a hugh improvement, but with FS9 again it was only marginaly. Since the performance was compareable to someone elses rig I know, in the end I just accepted it.Not to say by the way that I had a really bad performance in FS9, but we're always looking for improvements, aren't we.My new rig is still in works (waiting 3 weeks now for delivery of the HD5870 graphicscard), but I have good faith that this baby will run FS9 in all its glory and FSX with descent relatively high settings, especially once I start overclocking it :(

Regards,

Frank van der Werff

Banner_FS2Crew_Line_Pilot.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fwerff:My mistake, I misread FS2004/FS9 as FSX for some reason. You can still receive a pretty significant increase in FPS in FS9 from a graphics card upgrade, as long as you already run high graphics settings (high res, autogen, lots of AA). Raw FPS is governed by CPU speed in MSFS, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...