Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest WarpAir

cpu Upgrade advice DO i7920 or i7975 extreme

Recommended Posts

Guest WarpAir

Systemi7920 @ 3.8Ghz on air at 1.41 vcorenvidia GTx285Win7 64DDR3 6 gigMobo = Gigabyte ud3rNeed to upgrade from 3.8 Ghz and closer to 4.5Ghz etcoption 1 - i7920 DO stepping with coolit system elite liquid cpu cooler option 2 - i7975 extreme with Cooler master V10 air cooler Which system is more likely to hit the 4.5 Ghz mark, perosnally i prefer option one , cause it allows me to upgrade to better cooling, then i can buy i7975 a year later when price comes from 870

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both of those coolers are crap, both in terms of price and performance. If you absolutely must have 4.5GHz on an i7 you're going to need a very good water cooling setup, and not the kind you can buy in a single box. Otherwise, for 4GHz+ operation on air you'll need an extremely powerful cooler, something like Noctua's new DH-14 or Thermalright's IFX-14 (the Noctua is the better of the two, by a small amount).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Both of those coolers are crap, both in terms of price and performance. If you absolutely must have 4.5GHz on an i7 you're going to need a very good water cooling setup, and not the kind you can buy in a single box. Otherwise, for 4GHz+ operation on air you'll need an extremely powerful cooler, something like Noctua's new DH-14 or Thermalright's IFX-14 (the Noctua is the better of the two, by a small amount).
I have also heard less than complimentary reports about the V10. This from sources that like the V8... :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest WarpAir

Thanks for the info guys, would appreciate some more comments though.The question is D0 i7920 On liquid cooling ORI7975 On air cooling Which is more likely to reach stable 4.6 Ghz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have a better chance of getting to 4.6Ghz on liquid cooling however there is no guarantee you will attain a stable 4.6Ghz.I am running at 4.2Ghz on air with a Zalman CNPS10X Extreme.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest WarpAir
You would have a better chance of getting to 4.6Ghz on liquid cooling however there is no guarantee you will attain a stable 4.6Ghz.I am running at 4.2Ghz on air with a Zalman CNPS10X Extreme.
Thanks i am thinking of getting Zalman Reserator XT with do i7920. cpu block only cooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You really should abandon your idea of using pre-configured water cooling "in-a-box" kits, they're not worth the money. If you're going to go water with the intention of reaching high overclocks, you absolutely have to piece together everything individually. Suggestion: start reading the liquid cooling section on Xtremesystems.org. This forum is frequented by some of the best overclockers in the world, no exaggeration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest WarpAir
You really should abandon your idea of using pre-configured water cooling "in-a-box" kits, they're not worth the money. If you're going to go water with the intention of reaching high overclocks, you absolutely have to piece together everything individually. Suggestion: start reading the liquid cooling section on Xtremesystems.org. This forum is frequented by some of the best overclockers in the world, no exaggeration.
Thanks for the info.The problem is, i have no plans to get my hands dirty doing this myself, cause of time and risk.I found a pc builder that specialises in OC systems and every kind of cooling you can imagine, but they turned out too expensive. They do custom liquid and phase stuff.Meaning the onlly options i have left are the best of the off the shelf stuff.My calculation is that , the off the shelf liquid cooling stuff, still would be better than air.But i dont want to work too hard for this, that why i am sticking to off the shelf stuff. If i found an affordable builder in herts uk , that would be great, but the last guy quoted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your "calculation" is actually just speculation, and it is wrong. Not trying to be rude, just telling it like it is. Test after test from numerous hardware sites has shown that out-of-the-box water cooling kits actually perform worse than high-end air cooling, despite costing more and being significantly more complex to assemble and maintain. If you want specific advice on which parts to buy, visit the forum I linked you to above and ask those guys. If anyone can tell you what the best water cooling solution is, it's them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest WarpAir
Your "calculation" is actually just speculation, and it is wrong. Not trying to be rude, just telling it like it is. Test after test from numerous hardware sites has shown that out-of-the-box water cooling kits actually perform worse than high-end air cooling, despite costing more and being significantly more complex to assemble and maintain. If you want specific advice on which parts to buy, visit the forum I linked you to above and ask those guys. If anyone can tell you what the best water cooling solution is, it's them.
Ahh i see, never heard it said that top range air is better than off the shelf liquid cooling.The last thing i want is to go through the trouble of liquid, only to find not as good as air.I ll will have to take some time to look into this further, starting with the link you helped with.Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ahh i see, never heard it said that top range air is better than off the shelf liquid cooling.The last thing i want is to go through the trouble of liquid, only to find not as good as air.I ll will have to take some time to look into this further, starting with the link you helped with.Thanks
I do not believe that you can get to 4.5 GHz on any air cooling solution that will fit into a case unless you're going to run the PC in a meat locker with subzero ambient temps.4.5 GHz on a 920 is a long shot, too. That's as far as I have gotten my 975 on a very good custom-built water cooling system. To get the 920 that fast, you have to push the BCLK to 225 MHz. That's overspeeding the daylights out of a lot of other circuit components as well. It has been done, but it is not common.Honestly, your best shot at those speeds is to go with a 975 AND either a good water cooling system or a phase change cooler. I resolved my own concerns about water in the case by building my cooling tower outside the PC case, with the only connections inside the PC case being the two hoses going to the CPU cooling block. The reservoir, pump, and radiators are all in/above a deep plastic tray on the desk near the case.Also, FWIW, the Reserators are notorious for having noisy water pumps that go bad, as well as frequent alarms due to effects of even tiny air bubbles in the system.RegardsBob ScottColonel, USAF (ret)ATP IMEL Gulfstream II-III-IV-VColorado Springs, CO

Bob Scott | President and CEO, AVSIM Inc
ATP Gulfstream II-III-IV-V

System1 (P3Dv5/v4): i9-13900KS @ 6.0GHz, water 2x360mm, ASUS Z790 Hero, 32GB GSkill 7800MHz CAS36, ASUS RTX4090
Samsung 55" JS8500 4K TV@30Hz,
3x 2TB WD SN850X 1x 4TB Crucial P3 M.2 NVME SSD, EVGA 1600T2 PSU, 1.2Gbps internet
Fiber link to Yamaha RX-V467 Home Theater Receiver, Polk/Klipsch 6" bookshelf speakers, Polk 12" subwoofer, 12.9" iPad Pro
PFC yoke/throttle quad/pedals with custom Hall sensor retrofit, Thermaltake View 71 case, Stream Deck XL button box

Sys2 (MSFS/XPlane): i9-10900K @ 5.1GHz, 32GB 3600/15, nVidia RTX4090FE, Alienware AW3821DW 38" 21:9 GSync, EVGA 1000P2
Thrustmaster TCA Boeing Yoke, TCA Airbus Sidestick, 2x TCA Airbus Throttle quads, PFC Cirrus Pedals, Coolermaster HAF932 case

Portable Sys3 (P3Dv4/FSX/DCS): i9-9900K @ 5.0 Ghz, Noctua NH-D15, 32GB 3200/16, EVGA RTX3090, Dell S2417DG 24" GSync
Corsair RM850x PSU, TM TCA Officer Pack, Saitek combat pedals, TM Warthog HOTAS, Coolermaster HAF XB case

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is going from an achievable 4.0 GHz on air really that different in price/time/performance of an expensive liquid cooled 975 @ 4.5GHz???Seems like a lot to spend to do that. Maybe save the money and try to get your 920 up a bit higher? Maybe wait another year for the next CPUs to come out...


| FAA ZMP |
| PPL ASEL |
| Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 32GB 5600 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest FlyingBits
Systemi7920 @ 3.8Ghz on air at 1.41 vcorenvidia GTx285Win7 64DDR3 6 gigMobo = Gigabyte ud3rNeed to upgrade from 3.8 Ghz and closer to 4.5Ghz etcoption 1 - i7920 DO stepping with coolit system elite liquid cpu cooler option 2 - i7975 extreme with Cooler master V10 air cooler Which system is more likely to hit the 4.5 Ghz mark, perosnally i prefer option one , cause it allows me to upgrade to better cooling, then i can buy i7975 a year later when price comes from 870

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest WarpAir
Hi,Forget the V10, it is not even close to some of the good aircoolers. Also as was pointed out water cooling kits will not get you any farther than a good air kit. You might want to cheack out the Mgeahalems, I have just set up my new system (see sig) and I am flying FSX at 4.4Ghz on quiet air on a I7-920 and I'm not done trying to go further, but with 12 gigs of ram its not as easy as six so I dont know if 4.5-6 will happen. I have a very uncluttered CoolerMaster 840 case that helps, and every single wire and cable is tucked out of the way and the only noisey fan is a not too noisey 1200 rmp Nochtua. I cant imagine haveing to have the pumps running and all the fans and the hasel. Here is a good review of the best of the best in heat sinks: http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?opti...1&Itemid=62 Here is a good place for parts, I may be biased as these guys are just miles from my home but they are a really good place for everything cool: http://www.frozencpu.com/
thanks for the link, if i go air it might be with i7975

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest FlyingBits
thanks for the link, if i go air it might be with i7975
There is really no reason to get an 975, just throwing money away as a DO 920 will achieve as much and you can use the cash you saved to buy that fancy fermi card in March! :)Come, we all will hep you get there....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...