I ALWAYS check before buying!!

[PilotGW 1]

Ok folks, I'm gonna try again. Can someone answer my plea!!! Will FS2004/ACOF work on these specs: (probably not but here you are :-lol)1.5 Ghz Celeron processor512 DDR RAMGeForce 2 MX/MX 400 32MB Graphic/Video card (not sure what it is: graphic or video card.)Windows ME (sadly this is the pointless bit. I know there are problems with ME) Cheers,Greg WillsThe gregster has landed! :-wave

[PilotGW 1]

Sorry, made a mistake. Just found out I have a 1.7 not 1.5 processor.This should be correct1.7 Ghz Celeron processor512 DDR RAMGeForce 2 MX/MX 400 32MB Graphic/Video card Windows ME Cheers, Greg WillsThe gregster has landed! :-wave

[wsieffert 0]

Yes, your limitations will be with your graphics card. Some have had problems with WinME.I recommend you do some housekeeping on your computer, such as, unloading those Terminal Stay Resident (TSR) programs, many that have icons near your clock - you need to ask yourself, do I need those programs running using valuable processing power. Visit http://www2.whidbey.net/djdenham/index.htm for good information about cleaning up these programs. Do a complete disk scan and defrag.W. Sieffert

[PilotGW 1]

Thank you soooooooooooooo much for your reply!!!! :-hah :-hah :-hahCheers,Greg WillsThe gregster has landed! :-wave

[Dillon 2,197]

I'd stick with FS2002 for right now if I were you...

[Guest outtatimeiii]

Well, I am gonna give my system a go with FS2004 soon with a 1.2GHz Athlon and 256MB PC133 RAM. I personally don't care if the game runs fast or not, as long as it just RUNS LOL.

[PilotGW 1]

Sorry for replying so much!!! :-)But I run CFS3 absolutly fine with just the ocassional stutter with the sliders dragged to about 75% to the right. (almost full settings)Seeing that CFS3 has a more complex graphics engine I thought FS2004 would perform better which runs along the same line as FS2002.Could you tell me whether it runs better than CFS3.Cheers,Greg WillsThe gregster has landed! :-wave