Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
helloo

Intel 6850 to e8600 make a difference?

Recommended Posts

Would it make much of a difference upgrading from my 6850 to the e8600. That is the most processor my will support.


i9-10900k * 64GB 3600MHz Ram * RTX 3090 running 3 75" 4k displays smoothly.  

Full 737 MAX enclosed cockpit from FDS

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you need to know his name? That's only for PMDG forums...Anyway, to the OP, at stock speeds, I would say yes, the jump to the E8600 will help out somewhat. Moreso if you overclocked the E8600 to around 4GHz


| FAA ZMP |
| PPL ASEL |
| Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 32GB 5600 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why do you need to know his name? That's only for PMDG forums...
Oh?! That explains a few things, I really had the impression it was a general rule. WAS wondering how many ppl got away with not having their full name applied to their posts. Well, teaches me to read the small print :( Anyways. I

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6850 -> 8600 is not worth the upgrade, unless you do some serious overclocking. I know several people that have E6x50 chips running right around 3.6GHz and that seems to be about the maximum clock these chips are capable of without serious voltage and better-than-ambient cooling. The E8600 is definitely capable of higher clocks, 4.0-4.5GHz is attainable given the proper supporting equipment. If you're not going to overclock though, don't bother.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are into overclocking, I say GO FOR IT!I had a e6850 and the most I could o/c was 3.6-3.8, depending on ambient temp of the room. I then got the 8600 and was able to have a stable o/c of 4.45ghz!!! It made a world of difference in FSX and FS9. I believe the 8600 used a .45 die size vs the larger .65 of the e6850, so it was more efficient and ran at lower temp, which gives you more headroom to o/c. I found the 8600 a great chip for fs9, but I recently upgraded to a brand new i7 930 o/c'd to 4.2 ghz for a smoother experience with FSX.As long as you have the proper cpu heatsink for serious overclocking, the e8600 is a great value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is that if the OPs MB won't go better than an 8600, than he may not be able to OC very much or at all. In which case ram speed and GPU can help out. In any case a better cpu is a better cpu. More so if the price is right.Bob


Bob

i5, 16 GB ram, GTX 960, FS on SSD, Windows 10 64 bit, home built works anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...