FSXMark11

[Charlatan 68]

Now got to 4.2ghz

 

Hardware Configuration:      

CPU: Intel i5 4670k @ 4.2ghz

RAM: 2x4GB 2666 (11-13-13-35-2T)

GPU: MSI GTX670 2gb Power Edition

HDD: Seagate Hybrid 1TB            

 

FSXMark11 Results:      

Test Frames  Time (ms)  Min  Max  Avg

   2 14921        300000 30.0 69.0 49.7

   3 14756        300000 30.0 68.0 49.2

   4 14585        300000 30.0 67.0 48.6

AVG 14754      300000 30.0 68.0 49.2

 

Fair to say I am more than impressed.  Will try for 4.4/4.5 later

[Ted Striker 338]

That's impressive Charlatan. Those results are better than what Westman got on his 3770K at 4.6 ghz with the same memory. His results are linked in post #653. I'll be curious to see what you get at 4.5.

 

Ted

[Charlatan 68]

That's impressive Charlatan. Those results are better than what Westman got on his 3770K at 4.6 ghz with the same memory. His results are linked in post #653. I'll be curious to see what you get at 4.5.

 

Ted

 

Indeed.  I was wary of whether the upgrade would be worth it, but was only averaging 40-41 on my i7 2600k @ 4.5ghz with 1600mhz ram previously.  Couldn't believe the results from stock to be honest.  Will try and play some more in the week.  

[Ben Cap 89]

Indeed.  I was wary of whether the upgrade would be worth it, but was only averaging 40-41 on my i7 2600k @ 4.5ghz with 1600mhz ram previously.  Couldn't believe the results from stock to be honest.  Will try and play some more in the week.  

 

 

I am intrigued by these results... Thank you very much for running these tests. 

[westman 257]

Indeed.  I was wary of whether the upgrade would be worth it, but was only averaging 40-41 on my i7 2600k @ 4.5ghz with 1600mhz ram previously.  Couldn't believe the results from stock to be honest.  Will try and play some more in the week.

 

Nice result, it show the power of Haswell with fast mems

I run à very good 4670k today , retired the 4770k that one was 300mhz slower with the same cooling with vore 1.37v to the 4670k at 1.31v yes it do 5ghz on H110...

[Ted Striker 338]

 

 

run à very good 4670k today , retired the 4770k that one was 300mhz slower with the same cooling with vore 1.37v to the 4670k at 1.31v yes it do 5ghz on H110...

Have they improved the later batches of these processors or were your good results with the 4670k just the luck of the draw?

Ted

[westman 257]

Not really inprovements on later batches , was lucky to find à good one.

I was lucky to have the option to test 10 4670k and keep the 2 best CPUs

[Ted Striker 338]

 

 

I was lucky to have the option to test 10 4670k and keep the 2 best CPUs

 

Where do you buy your CPUs? I'm buying my next one from them! :lol:

 

Ted

[walterh 0]

 

New build, can't wait to see how my add-on aircraft perform now!

[Ted Striker 338]

Very informative results. Walter's and Charlatan's results clearly show the benefits of fast memory. And how much better the 4000 series is over my 3770k.

 

Ted

[Charlatan 68]

Can't see why anyone is buying 1600mhz RAM. Mine was only a fraction dearer than it

[westman 257]

Hi

Here is a missing test seen no AMD tests decided to do one.

Can compare with my 2700K, 3770K, 4770K and I5-760 running the same mems.

 

 

 

[SAAB340 28]

Hi

Here is a missing test seen no AMD tests decided to do one.

Can compare with my 2700K, 3770K, 4770K and I5-760 running the same mems.

 

 

 

Didn't know you had a FX3850 to play with. Excellent to see a result with Piledriver and see how much it differs against Haswell. You don't fancy running FSXmarkCPU on it?

[westman 257]

Did testing single tread apps with the piledriver 3D01 ( dx9 ) now that it was bad but not this bad. Phenom II at 4.1ghz performs like à bulldozer or piledriver at 5ghz..

I had time to install fsx on the w7 disk and running it on the 670.

I forget to do the fsmark CPU test but shall do that.

[boom_box 0]

Can anyone with AMD A10 7850K make a benchtest on FSXmark11.

Still can't decide if I should go with FX 8350 vs i5 4670/4670k.