Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
danieln

FLEX/assumed temps.

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, Just wondering, how does one calculate the most appropriate assumed outside temperature for derated takeoffs? I can see there are Assumed temp limit charts and N1% difference charts for various derates available in the ops manual, but how do we actually go about calculating the more optimum assumed temperature for a takeoff? The tutorial flight provides a very elementary explanation to flex temps but it doesn't talk about deriving specific numbers. For example when 40C is used for OAT 15C Never really cared about it before the NGX came out, but since service based maintenance failures occur I guess the stress on the engines is simulated to some extent? (or not?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One word: http://www.topcatsim.com/ If you want to play with it though, take a good size runway and aim for something like 92%N1, then see what suits you best D-TO1 or D-TO2 or a mix of assumed temp and D-TO. Topcat has me often take off with flaps 1 and then assumed temp of about 45-50 degrees. It extends the life time of engines a lot! So better use up more asphalt than engine! Hope it helps happy.png


Yours truly
Boaz Fraizer
Copenhagen, Denmark

Boeing777_Banner_Pilot.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The easiest way is a payware option: TOPCAT takeoff and performance tool.It will figure the best derate (either assumed temp, or derated, or both!) option for you based on your aircraft weight, airport runway criteria, and weather. Very painless, no looking up info on charts, and it's very accurate because it's based on the real world NG data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One word: http://www.topcatsim.com/ If you want to play with it though, take a good size runway and aim for something like 92%N1, then see what suits you best D-TO1 or D-TO2 or a mix of assumed temp and D-TO. Topcat has me often take off with flaps 1 and then assumed temp of about 45-50 degrees. It extends the life time of engines a lot! So better use up more asphalt than engine! Hope it helps happy.png
Thanks for that, I'll definitely be checking that out! With the PMDG failure simulation, are engines constantly used without adequate derating more likely to fail quicker than those which are, or - are serviced based failures purely based on hours of use and completely disregard engine stressing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it's one of the things it monitors. It says in the manual that this function will take note of how the aircraft is used IE hard landing etc. So I would think they programmed it to notice wear and tear of the engine.


Yours truly
Boaz Fraizer
Copenhagen, Denmark

Boeing777_Banner_Pilot.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you want to know what FLEXIBLE really means?


Omar Josef
737/757/767

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...