Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
namida

Flare and Idle thrust

Recommended Posts

Because NGX is the first aircraft for FS that implemented Approach Idle and need quite little adjustment for flare,it is time consuming process be familiar with it's character. I usually set idle at 100ft and flare at 50 with othere aircrafts, so I want to know is my behavior is in permissable range.Many cockpit video performing manual landing shows perfectly same as NGX autoland shows, it's hard to change old habit :) Eventually I get used to do that, but still curious I'm doing right or not.Any advice would be appreciate. laugh.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going idle anywhere from ~70 to 30 feet. No flare is really needed when I'm landing. Just hold whatever pitch (+0-2 degrees) you have at Vref.


___________________________________________________________________________________

Zachary Waddell -- Caravan Driver --

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/zwaddell

Avsim ToS

Avsim Screenshot Rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The point is there's there's barely any "flare" when landing the NGX. Regardless of the real world or b737.orgs' technique

___________________________________________________________________________________

Zachary Waddell -- Caravan Driver --

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/zwaddell

Avsim ToS

Avsim Screenshot Rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys but I think it is pointless to discuss the NGX "flare" techniques yet, as we don't know what adjustments (if any) will bring the SP1. As PMDG mentioned it is something that will be looked into and most likely there will be changes. So, today pitch 0-2 on landing might change tomorrow.


 

Regards,

Martin Martinov / VATSIM 1207931

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guys but I think it is pointless to discuss the NGX "flare" techniques yet, as we don't know what adjustments (if any) will bring the SP1. As PMDG mentioned it is something that will be looked into and most likely there will be changes. So, today pitch 0-2 on landing might change tomorrow.
Yeah, but the OP wanted advice. Tonight. happy.png

___________________________________________________________________________________

Zachary Waddell -- Caravan Driver --

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/zwaddell

Avsim ToS

Avsim Screenshot Rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NGX really doesn't need much flare, but I'm not say to discussing it's attitude, just want to know how people are get used to NGX's new genuine characteristic.Well actually using hud like fighter jets makes landing A LOT easier but, well.. you know.. I want a classic flight at some perspective.. :) I found autoland pushs yoke little bit when descent rate is almost less than 100fpm so I'm trying to do that. xPNowadays I always make NGX floats - up and down (I usually enjoy autoland and didn't practice manual landing much) Thank you guys for kind advices and it's especially impressive zach's style watching Vref instead fpm. I will try that, too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was throttling back at 20 feet and simultaneous slight flare, two degrees. However, I now throttle back at the 30 foot call, and flare slightly, a couple of degrees. I find this better. Incidentally, if you look at the real world HUD videos, you will also see a fare at the 30 foot call.

http://www.youtube.c...tch?v=nGn399xzM-
Martin Wilby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i am still struggling with this one. getting better, but still the odd float or bounce, or just plain hard.


Rick Hobbs

Boeing777_Banner_Pilot.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I throttle back at 50ft, then initiate a flare right after I hear the 20ft call. I lose a lot of airspeed in that last 50ft sometimes so it's something I'm working at step by step to get in close to r/w technique. I think it's pretty difficult to really judge the flare or even complete one with FSX's limited field of view...your peripheral probably gleams a lot more in the real aircraft making it possible to pull off that last 15ft or so flare as mentioned above. For me, it's more a quarter of an inch back on the saitek yoke then any actual visual reference. If the aircraft floats then I just let it. Can't always win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The point is there's there's barely any "flare" when landing the NGX. Regardless of the real world or b737.orgs' technique
Boeing did this on purpose. The 800/900's longer fuselage has higher risk of tail strike, and the flare should not be accomplished with much attitude. More discussions here: http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/289527-landing-technique-b737ng.html and http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/10335-difficulty-landing-737-800-true-any-pointers.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow I found even real world pilot pushes yoke while flare in the movies Wilby linked.Now I know 50ft is a normal height many people and autopilot start flare.. ok I'll practice with this.. And I love pprune! most satisfying answers by googling ends at there. Thank you Nirattisal. Still, the height to set idle thrust is the most subtle part to master! laugh.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The smoothest landing I have done yet on the NGX was one where I never idled the thrust. I had remembered to turn the A/T off, but never idled the thrust. It was silky smooth, I had only noticed that I did not idle the thrust because that lovely sound of the spoilers deploying automatically never occured and a quick sweep brought the high fan speed to my attention. But on a proper landing, I idle just when I cross the threshold, or just about to, a second or so prior, and then barely a flare, and I mean barely a flare, at around 20 to 10 feet above the groundthen a nice soft landing on the runway, better than Pete Conrad, way better than Neil Armstrong.


Scott Kalin VATSIM #1125397 - KPSP Palm Springs International Airport
Space Shuttle (SSMS2007) http://www.space-shu....com/index.html
Orbiter 2010P1 http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Flying" the aircraft to the ground with a bit of thrust do result in typically smooth landings....but you will have all the excess energy to get rid of which isn't always 'convenient'. Although I won't lie it was something I was guilty of it back in glider days...hahahaa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...