Now we have Orlando!

 

http://secure.simmarket.com/flyxplane-orlando-intl-airport-x-plane.phtml

Ugly...

Ugly...

Geez dude, you don't have to leave such a d-bag (edit) response.  How about you say nothing..  

Geez dude, you don't have to leave such a doucebag response.  How about you say nothing..  

 

I wouldn't go as far as calling it ugly, but I have to agree to the point, I don't see anything special here, at least from the available screenshots Certainly not to the level of payware like FlyTampa, FSDT, Aerosoft, or even Imaginesim.. It's better than a vacant lot though!!!

Hey guys,

 

This is my second scenery project doing it from scratch for X-Plane.

I agree it's not the best of the best. I've personally been using FS since I was 16 years old.

Sure it's not as good as FSDT which is the quality I want to aim for, or Flytampa but we will get there.

There are a lot of nicer sceneries around for X-Plane but then they are all converted from FSX or some author just copies the textures from another payware scenery from FSX to sell it as their own (yes I have the evidence of some of those also).

This is pure X-plane design for X-plane, no FSX migrations, no texture copying and copyright infringement.

I am looking into contributing to the X-Plane world so we can have more places to fly to. I do some freeware scenery at the ORG as well, but maybe I do one or two which are payware and 14.95 each, which I don't think it hits someone into poverty if they buy it.

If you want to contribute so I can keep making scenery packages your contribution will be appreciated. If you don't like it, it's your decision. Nobody is putting a gun to your head for you to buy it..

Does remind me of the simplistic looking payware planes that were cranked out for X-plane until recently. Yes, it's better than a vacant lot, but won't attract those who are thinking of jumping ship. Well, at least most of those....

 

Not payware quality by a long shot

Yeah, after looking at it again, based on the price, I take back most of my criticism. For what it is it's a fair price!!!

Hi Teofilo,

 

We all have to start somewhere. Don't let negative comments get you down. Keep working with passion and patience, you will succeed.

 

Best of luck with your projects.

Good for u Teofilo, keep it up!

 

Don't listen the senseless comments like the one minos made. People like that just don't have any idea of the amount of work devs like you put into a scenery project.

 

Carlos

it's great and the price is right :drinks:  :good:

Hey guys,

This is my second scenery project doing it from scratch for X-Plane.
I agree it's not the best of the best. I've personally been using FS since I was 16 years old.
Sure it's not as good as FSDT which is the quality I want to aim for, or Flytampa but we will get there.
There are a lot of nicer sceneries around for X-Plane but then they are all converted from FSX or some author just copies the textures from another payware scenery from FSX to sell it as their own (yes I have the evidence of some of those also).
This is pure X-plane design for X-plane, no FSX migrations, no texture copying and copyright infringement.
I am looking into contributing to the X-Plane world so we can have more places to fly to. I do some freeware scenery at the ORG as well, but maybe I do one or two which are payware and 14.95 each, which I don't think it hits someone into poverty if they buy it.
If you want to contribute so I can keep making scenery packages your contribution will be appreciated. If you don't like it, it's your decision. Nobody is putting a gun to your head for you to buy it..

Can you please make me CYUL :Praying:   I will pay you for your time$$$$$$$ :lol:

Got to make it better to charge people. If it was free be good add-on, but when you charge people quality and expectations have to be higher. I could do that quality level for free. Do not take it personally. The realty is just big distinction between pay-ware and freeware. I see freeware as a way to pressure pay ware developers to up their level of quality.

You're right, we are working on an improved version that will be available soon. Will keep you posted and of all those that bought the product will receive this new version at no cost as soon as it's available.

 

Regards,

Teo

Good for u Teofilo, keep it up!

 

Don't listen the senseless comments like the one minos made. People like that just don't have any idea of the amount of work devs like you put into a scenery project.

 

Carlos

 

Except that Minos has released some sceneries in the past and know what he is talking about. I do not want to start a **** contest, but back then my sceneries were probably not of the most sophisticated kind but they were free. This is not the case here. Not payware quality. Sorry. Blunt but honest. 

Except that Minos has released some sceneries in the past and know what he is talking about. I do not want to start a **** contest, but back then my sceneries were probably not of the most sophisticated kind but they were free. This is not the case here. Not payware quality. Sorry. Blunt but honest.

I think your response of "Ugly" was rude and uncalled for.

I think there are a few details that could be added that will make this scenery look more realistic. One is to add the observation deck to the control tower. Add some trees around the ponds that surround the terminals. One of the main things, is Orlando has a number of roads surrounding the airport, that appear to be missing in this scenery. One of the main highways Route 528 (The Bee line, now known as the Beach line) is missing that runs just North of Runway 17L/R-18L/R. I can't tell from the shots, but I would guess Route 407 is missing as well.

 

I also think the shots used to market this may not be doing it any justice. It looks like scenery detail settings are way down when these shot were taken. It's possible the scenery is better then publicly depicted, if the scenery settings were increased.