Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is a forum of my findings with testing FSX and CrossfireX.

 

My system:

 

OS: Windows 7 x64

CPU: i7-980 3.33ghz

Ram: 16 GB Sniper 1866

SSD: 250 GB Samsung 840, 2 X OCZ 60 GB

HDD: 1 TB Hitachi, 1 Samsung HD105SI

CD/DVD Drive: HP CDDVDW

GPU: 2 X Radeon HD 7850 2GB OC'd to 1050, 1400

 

FSX with Crossfire with Bojote tweak tool:

Settings:

 

[Graphics]

Fram Rate: Unlimited

Resolution: 1920x1080

Anisotropic: On

Anti-aliasing: Checked

Global Texture: Very High

Lens Flare: Check

Advanced Animations: Check

 

[Aircraft]

Default View: 3-D virtual cockpit

High Res: Check

Aircraft Lights Illum Ground: Check

 

[scenery]

LOD: Large

Mesh com: 75

Mesh res: 5m

Texture res: 15cm

Water effects: Low 2.x

Scenery com: Extreme

Autogen den: Dense

Special effects: High

 

[Weather]

Cloud Draw: 60mi

Cloud Detail: Detaild  and maximum

Downloads Winds Aloft: Check

Rate of Change: Medium

 

[Traffic]

All 0 and Labels Off

 

[sound]

All 50

 

 

Results:

 

Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (in air): 38-60

Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (on ground): 34-50

 

Ultra Light and KLAX (FsDreamteam {in air}): 30-40

Ultra Light and KLAX (FsDreamteam {on ground}): 25-45

 

NGX and KLAX (FsDreamteam {in air}): 14-18

NGX and KLAX (FsDreamteam {on ground}): 14-16

 

Now the major jumps in fps on some results is because I panned around the VC and those were the averages.

 

FSX without CFX:

 

Same Settings and CFG as before.

 

Results:

 

Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (in air): 40-50

Ultra Light and Friday Harbor (on ground): 40-80

 

Ultra Light and KLAX (in air): 34-54

Ultra Light and KLAX (on ground): 38-60

 

NGX and KLAX (in air): 20-30

NGX and KLAX (on ground): 25-40

 



I forgot to mention that I have ORBX, REX Essential, and ASE installed and running while doing these tests.


a54316-5.png

 

Share this post


Link to post

FSX doesn't use the benefits of dual GPU's.

Yes I know that I was just showing my findings.


a54316-5.png

 

Share this post


Link to post

Nothing wrong with your findings :-) Looks like good results. Just wanted to mention this as your topic title can be a bit misleading.

Share this post


Link to post

Oh ok and yeah my findings show some crazy results. Having a Overclocked cpu is worse than just leaving it alone from what I've seen also.


a54316-5.png

 

Share this post


Link to post

Oh ok and yeah my findings show some crazy results. Having a Overclocked cpu is worse than just leaving it alone from what I've seen also.

 

That must be an anomaly. Overclocking can make a huge difference to frames. My i52500k stock at 3.6ghz gets about 12-15fps with the NGX in Orbx and UK2000 Heathrow. When I clock it to 4.8ghz I get lovely smooth 30fps.

 

FSX is hugely CPU bound. Faster processor = Faster FSX 

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...