Frame artes 132 + everythign maxed out. can I expect more?

[oqvist 11]

Another one that needs phase change ;)Really come on guys you spend top dollars for the worst out there and then don

[Guest psouthan]

Thank for your reply John. I am sure you are right! I was interested in particular to read your post because you mention the word 'jealous' and something dawned on me...that evidently you are not the only one.I am disheartened to have read other posts. My post was a genuine comment from a relative novice, seeking to ask a general question about frames rates. Suddnely, and unexpectedly,I seem to have unleashed something, not from youI might add! Anyway, suffice to say thank you for drawing my attention to it. I shall be more selective with my postings in future and try to avoid the unsavory bitter ones.I will get a picture posted. i have just been going nuts trying to reduce the byte size in order for to upload one...I have almost given up. If you know where in Microsoft photo Editor I can adjust it i will be happy to post a shot for you. failing that i will be more than happy to email one to you.In fact, based on some comments here I would prefer to do that. i am not into playing games and hving to prove myself.RegardsPaul

[Mike T 208]

Not even close my friend. :-)The FX-53 comes standard at 2.4Ghz which is as fast asthe AMD 64 3800+. With my Waterchill cooling on the CPU, Northbridge and Radeon 9800 (read my specs down below) I have it cranked up to 2.8Ghz which leaves the 3800+ behind and is faster than the Intel 4Ghz Extreme models.With a Vapochill (assuming phase-cooling here?), I would imagine that you can go higher than you are.All the best,Mike T.

[oqvist 11]

Okay so we are at the same level since mine are faster than the 3800+ if you take into consideration the FSB I run my mem at and that I have 1 mb cache. But then I probably payed less for vappo and CPU then you for your FX 53 lol. True you are some percent faster anyway because it

[Guest hoghead]

If the poster will simply (prima facie) post a screen shot of his Frame Rate counter and it registers 133+ at KLAX I'll send you a check for $6,000,000. That's how believable I think your assertion is. John Franklin

[michal 44]

..

[JSkorna 137]

Hi Paul,You keep running at 132. I'll keep running at 150 with my AMD64 3400 with 4X,4X and we'll both be happy. No, not at KLAX at sea level, but not at 37K either, but at 18K with weather all around.Hope this helps,JimActiveSky Supporthttp://www.hifisim.com/images/as2004proudsupporter.jpg

[oqvist 11]

What you should do if you have framerates over your refresh rate is enabling vsync so that don

[JSkorna 137]

I love watching those numbers on the screen. Watching 75 is not the same as watching 150.Hope this helps,JimActiveSky Supporthttp://www.hifisim.com/images/as2004proudsupporter.jpg

[Guest PaulL01]

http://www.frontiernet.net/~pleatzaw/images/FS504fpsa.JPGWOW!!!!All sliders maxed! All blue air molecules set to extremely dense!504 fps is the limit that the FPS counter will go.(that was done on an old AMD setup with a GF4TI4200, not the little XP on steroids you see below :) )Wooooo! :-roll

[Guest B1900 Mech]

:-lol http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/94334.jpg

[Guest psouthan]

Gee...I am astonished! I merely asked for some comments about what you can expect from a video card, not insults! Do you think you can grow up a bit? I made no claims to be able to run my card over KLAX or KJKF or whatever at this spec or that spec...and thank you for the offer of $6000,0000 xxxx but no thanks.Ridiculous. Please if you want to pursue this futher do it privately and not waste anymore space on it.psouthan@hotmail.comPaulIssue closed

[Guest JoeW]

Hmmmmmmm Side effects?...... I think it will warp the computer case and melt the back off the moniter. Running it that fast also will wear out the software faster... More friction.Joe W.

[oqvist 11]

Well it