777-200LR Landing in PGUM

[mrchrsrider 66]

Enjoy, this flight was so much fun... No Filter, or Extra Scenery

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for looking,

Chris

[Phantom88 3,278]

WOW!!! Those look so Realistic!! Bravo!!!

[mrchrsrider 66]

Thanks phantom

[Dan208B 0]

What 777 is this?

[mrchrsrider 66]

What 777 is this?

It's ramzesses 777-200LR professional and it's incredibly realistic PMDG quality or better in my opinion

[Nuno Pinto 1,394]

Realistic?  With the engines off while in mid air?

[mrchrsrider 66]

Realistic? With the engines off while in mid air?

Do you own it? Cause last time I checked the engines have to be running for it to fly

[ahuimanu 50]

It's ramzesses 777-200LR professional and it's incredibly realistic PMDG quality or better in my opinion

PMDG: often imitated, but never duplicated

[mrchrsrider 66]

Haha I see I have started a war by saying that, fine I take back my previous statement, and issue a new statement that this 777 is In a class of its own

[FloG 148]

Outstanding shots! They look almost real (except for the engines which do indeed look like they're off -_- , but if NaMcO hadn't said that I woudn't have recognized)

[fritzgohl 29]

my vote goes to the first one

 

Regards;

 

Fritz

[mrchrsrider 66]

Haha ya I know exactly what you mean with the engines, when you shutdown your plane in xplane and load up the replay it keeps the engines off

[MdMax 233]

Great shots ! :Applause:

[tf51d 284]

It's ramzesses 777-200LR professional and it's incredibly realistic PMDG quality or better in my opinion

It may be good, but it's not better than PMDG will be as it doesn't have a prototypical cockpit for a 200LR

 

1. A fictitious TO/GA button on the MCP

 

2. It has standard standby gauges as would be found on the 200 or 200ER. The 200LR should have the ISFD gauge.

 

3. The EFB is not modeled like the real one. Even the CS777 got this one right!!!

 

Edit: Also why does Ramzesses think passengers exit from the right on the 777?

[mrchrsrider 66]

It may be good, but it's not better than PMDG will be as it doesn't have a prototypical cockpit for a 200LR

 

1. A fictitious TO/GA button on the MCP

 

2. It has standard standby gauges as would be found on the 200 or 200ER. The 200LR should have the ISFD gauge.

 

3. The EFB is not modeled like the real one. Even the CS777 got this one right!!!

 

Edit: Also why does Ramzesses think passengers exit from the right on the 777?

Ya tf51 I understand where your coming from, what makes it a better aircraft in my opinion is 1. the systems for the most part are realistic, aside from a couple tiny things that don't matter to me like a TO/GA button on the MCP and an EFB you never use because you usually have the charts on your knee anyways. PMDG also has a fake TO/GA button on the MCP 2. Coupled with flight dynamics xplane has, you don't feel like your flying something on rails. Also I know this is not important to most but the fact that they took the time to model the whole entire plane, instead of just the cockpit. So you feel more immersion in the plane instead of feeling like your flying just a cockpit. I know they don't model the entire plane due to lack of resources however as the hobby moves into the future MSFS is showing its age and if I were to recommend an updated platform and realistic plane it would be ramzesses 777, because sooner or later we are all gonna have to face the music that MSFS is an aging system and can no longer compete with newer products.

 

Chris