More P3D v2 Screenshots

[737guy1 39]

It looks like there is gona be still quite a performance hit to use these nice new features that make it better than FSX.

[MarkW 1,491]

Am I the only one who doesn't plan on switching to P3D?

 

I will be taking a wait and see attitude on P3D V2.  Before I switch (or more likely add) I would like to make sure that most of my prized addons can be ported over.  The hassle of maintaining two version of a flight sim is also a concern.

[alainneedle1 97]

I'll be waiting and see.

 

If they make another major improvement in the future will we have to pay for it also like V2.0? I know nobody has the answer to that but I was just wondering...

[simmerhead 885]

Anyone else find all the screenshots very dark and gloomy?

[Anxu00 176]

I will be taking a wait and see attitude on P3D V2.  Before I switch (or more likely add) I would like to make sure that most of my prized addons can be ported over.  The hassle of maintaining two version of a flight sim is also a concern.

You are waiting for FSL A320 and PMDG 744 V2, so it's safe to say that you won't be switching any time soon, as those will not work in P3D.

 

I for one will not switch.  I turned off road traffics and lower autogen for tube liner flight and the current visual with FSX for those type of flight with the add-ons looks great already.  For GA flights I use X-Plane 10.  

[tttocs 301]

 

 

Other companies have the decency to close the shop when things are done but RXP keeps on milking their old stuff... Shame on him/them.

 

While I'd rather have the product fully supported, I actually prefer that it still be available - but I certainly recommend that the buyer beware and understand what they're getting and not getting, and that includes the fact that it will not work in the current version of P3D, and I'm sure by extension 2.0.

 

 

 

So it's not LM faults there's not going to be any RXP products for their simulation. Maybe it's time to start looking for alternatives...

 

Been looking for a long time, but not finding.  Would love to see Mindstar's product become available so we can take a look and have potential alternatives, but the company met with a rather interesting response from the community.  Not sure what they're going to do now.

 

Bottom line for me as a GA flyer is that a quality GPS solution is a must before I can make any serious move.

 

Scott

[LeeL 272]

You are waiting for FSL A320 and PMDG 744 V2, so it's safe to say that you won't be switching any time soon, as those will not work in P3D.

 

I for one will not switch. I turned off road traffics and lower autogen for tube liner flight and the current visual with FSX for those type of flight with the add-ons looks great already. For GA flights I use X-Plane 10.

Is it confirmed the FSL won't work? That's what I'm waiting for most of all

 

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

 

 

[jetsflier 87]

Is it confirmed the FSL won't work? That's what I'm waiting for most of all

 

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

 

I may be wrong but from what I recall they will be releasing a sort of 'standard' version and afterwards they plan to release a 'professional' version that will comply to LM's P3D. Whether it will work in P3D v2 is questionable but I see no reason why it might not.

[LeeL 272]

I may be wrong but from what I recall they will be releasing a sort of 'standard' version and afterwards they plan to release a 'professional' version that will comply to LM's P3D. Whether it will work in P3D v2 is questionable but I see no reason why it might not.

No that's right

 

With a professional price I'm sure

[vgbaron 3,587]

I'll be waiting and see.

 

If they make another major improvement in the future will we have to pay for it also like V2.0? I know nobody has the answer to that but I was just wondering...

Alain - how long have you been around computers? And you still ask this question?    Of course we will have to pay for a MAJOR improvement. That's the way it is. Minor improvements, service packs, point releases are usually free but any major improvement comes with a price.

 

Why should LM be any different? Last I heard they were a business interested in making a profit.

 

Vic

[GodAtum 69]

I may be wrong but from what I recall they will be releasing a sort of 'standard' version and afterwards they plan to release a 'professional' version that will comply to LM's P3D. Whether it will work in P3D v2 is questionable but I see no reason why it might not.

 

Im building an A320 home cockpit so will be waiting for FSL pro release, hopefully the cost is similar to Sim Avionics and AST (~$1000)

[tkellogg 23]

Mike,

 

Thanks for the link to the screenshots. Obviously a lot of people on this thread can't read. The title clearly reads More P3D V2 Screenshots yet we have people on hear discussing whether to switch or not and third party addons. Can we not please stay on topic and keep this post for those who want to see more version 2 screenshots?

 

Tom Kellogg

[DylanM 1,069]

More screenshots showing terrain shadows here:

http://www.orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/67994-p3d-v2-iceland-demo/

[gboz 157]

Anyone else find all the screenshots very dark and gloomy?

Yes, agree.

Maybe it's the HDR.

Hope you can turn it off completely.

gb.

[Øystein Johansen 1]

Yes, agree.

Maybe it's the HDR.

Hope you can turn it off completely.

gb.

 HDR can be turned off yes, so no worries