P3D v2 with CPU/GPU Performance Data ***Image Heavy***

[shadow_boxer 7]

Just thought I'd post a few pics. Nothing special in terms of a set but just to show performance in familiar locations. So far, I'm finding P3D2 so much better than FSX in terms of performance. Visually there isn't much in it but I think there will be even more performance to come once we find the right settings and cfg tweaks. These are completely unedited, just resized. Hopefully you can make out CPU/GPU. 1440p, tesselation high, FXAA off, HDR enabled, shadows low, MSAA 8, Ansio 8X, triple buffering enabled, frame rate unlimited, v-sync on. City flying 20-30fps (Aerosoft NYC, San Francisco), complex airports 20-25fps, UTX+FTX Global 45-60fps! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Dillon 2,197]

Great shots, is that add-on scenery for Boston I see?

[SolRayz 392]

Those are nice shots. What location is the first picture, Princess Julianna?

[shadow_boxer 7]

Thanks guys. 

 

@Dillon, yes the Boston airport is the scenery from BluePrint Simulations. The city I believe is just default P3D with FTX Global 1.1.

 

@Sol, indeed it is TNCM. 

[SLKVP 13]

Great Shots.

Is that airplane, Lotus Sim's  L-39 or one by another developer ?

[shadow_boxer 7]

Correct it's the Lotus Simulations L-39. Works fine in P3D v2.0 as far as I can tell. 

[Phantom88 3,284]

Stunning Detail,I'm still holding out with P3D 1.4 but I don't know how much longer till I cave to P3D V2

[shadow_boxer 7]

Thank. Well I only made the jump from fsx to v2 as I had to reinstall everything anyway after upgrading to Windows 8 otherwise I probably wouldn't have done it just yet. Personally I'd hold fire until some of the teething problems have been ironed out. Just my 2c especially if your v1.4 install is running happily.