Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
utexgrad

SSD - Scenery or P3D?

Recommended Posts

I can only have one or the other, not both, so which do you think is best, putting P3D on my SSD or putting scenery on it? My initial thought was to have the scenery on it for faster loading, but I'm interested in hearing from others who may have crossed this bridge already. Thanks!!

Share this post


Link to post

P3D would be my choice but why not try both ways out with a couple of sceneries to see which you prefer.

Share this post


Link to post

And I bet that visually you will not see one iota of difference regardless of which goes where.  I think a lot of what we do is a matter of fad and self delusion rather than of any real difference.  IMHO & let the screamers begin.

Share this post


Link to post

I have both on the SSD and can confirm it loads faster than on a Western Digital black HDD. It wont improve FPS though.

Share this post


Link to post

Definitely use it for P3D. 

 

I did a little self experiment testing add-on photoreal scenery which means hundred's of individual textures loading and unloading.  So I put the same entire state on a SSD, a WD Velocerapter, and a 7200RMP HDD.  Switching back and forth I could detect little to no real difference between the three with my typical flying.  At least, not to the point saying one was unanimously better than the others in performance, adding extended blurry time, etc.  They were all very good in P3D.  So I use the 512GB SSD for P3D and now just purchase 3-4TB 7200 HDD's as the price is good, holds a ton of addons, and no big performance drop.


Intel i9-12900KF, Asus Prime Z690-A MB, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, (3) SK hynix M.2 SSD (2TB ea.), 16TB Seagate HDD, EVGA GeForce 3080 Ti, Corsair iCUE H70i AIO Liquid Cooler, UHD/Blu-ray Player/Burner (still have lots of CDs, DVDs!)  Windows 10, (hold off for now on Win11),  EVGA 1300W PSU
Netgear 1Gbps modem & router, (3) 27" 1440 wrap-around displays
Full array of Saitek and GoFlight hardware for the cockpit

Share this post


Link to post

I don't get the question so well. Put the whole P3D together with its total content on the SSD.

Spirit

Share this post


Link to post

I used to have P3D on an SSD and when 2.2 came out it went on a normal hardrive. There are some stutters but I suspect a weak video card and the load cloud shadows place on the poor video card. 

 

Shorter loading times definitely a plus. However, a well designed program such as P3D will constantly be looking ahead and preloading scenery into memory based on your direction of travel. However, if you are looking around, and changing course, then it has to quickly grab stuff from the disk to meet the need of the new course. Autopilot at 35,000 feet is a waste of money for an SSD.

 

I have a train simulator with old, and very poor, buffering. I put it on the SSD because of that, It benefitted and the pauses a very minimal. Yes it used to pause. 


regards,

Dick near Pittsburgh, USA

Share this post


Link to post

Since it wasn't mentioned in the initial post or subsequent suggestions, I find it to be best to always (*always!) put your operating system and day-to-day programs on the SSD first and foremost. It will make the absolute biggest impact to your daily computing and be far more valuable to you than having a fast-loading simulation.

 

SSD's will improve the flight loading times for both MSFS-based simulators and X-Plane, however it will not substantially improve the in-sim performance in either FPS, smoothness, or texture loading. It's been my experience that an SSD's capabilities are far better leveraged when applied to the computer as a whole - the OS and your apps - rather than just the games and sims.

 

If you HAD to choose between the sim itself and some scenery going on the SSD, I'd have a hard time choosing. You're using such a small percentage of both collections at any one time while flying that it's hard to quantify which one should get the loading speed boost. I'd probably opt to put the simulation itself and high priority scenery on the SSD, with a traditional drive holding the rest.

 

Ideally speaking, (2) SSD's would be grand.... one for the OS and apps, another for your simulations.

 

Good luck in your decisions!

-Greg

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...