Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Driver170

High winds takeoff

Recommended Posts

On navigraph STAR charts for engine failure you have a box some say NON STD and STD for engine failure what are these?

 

Also MNM CLIMB GRADIENT 6.6 % to 5000 what is the calculation for that guys?


Vernon Howells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See SID 25L/C MARUN 3F/3J TOBAK 4f/4J: Climb gradient 12 % to D8.4 FFM.

 

This means you have to climb 12 % in altitude for the distance of 8.4 nautical miles from FFM. 

 

12 % of 8.4 is 1 nautical mile. 1 NM = 6074 ft.

 

If you have a ground speed of say 180 knots on climb out you cover 8.4 nautical miles in 2.8 minutes

 

In that time you need to climb 1 mile. Again 1 NM = 6074 ft.

 

6074 ft / 2.8 min = 2169 ft / min.

 

So basically 180 knots ground speed on climbout requires rate of climb of more than 2169 ft/min to make the profile set in the SID. 

 

 

The easy way to calculate it in the cockpit is to multiply your ground speed with the % gradient:

 

12 % gradient x GS180 = 2160 ft/min

 

7 % gradient x GS180 = 1260 ft/min

 

5 % gradient x GS160 = 800 ft/min

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where did you get that 2.8 min from?

 

Thanks for the sum dude :)


Vernon Howells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 


Where did you get that 2.8 min from?

 

If you have a ground speed of say 180 knots on climb out you cover 8.4 nautical miles in 2.8 minutes. Now, the 180 knots is just an example. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh but how do you do the maths 180 kts in 8.4 nm ?

 

My maths sucks dude being honest here lol


Vernon Howells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeh but how do you do the maths 180 kts in 8.4 nm ?

 

My maths sucks dude being honest here lol

Knots is simply nautical miles per hour, so you take 8.4, divide it by 180 knots, and that gives you the time to travel that distance in hours. Multiply by 60 and you get 2.8 minutes.


Captain Kevin

nGsKmfi.jpg

Air Kevin 124 heavy, wind calm, runway 4 left, cleared for take-off.

Live streams of my flights here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But do we actually need to do this for the 737 as the FMC will do this when in VNAV?

 

 

How about 7.4 % for 4500 i got 2,300 fpm and climbing out at 168 knots?


Vernon Howells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 


How about 7.4 % for 4500 i got 2,300 fpm and climbing out at 168 knots?

 

Then it is as follows: (7.4 x 168) ft/min = 1243,2 ft / min required. So you are good to go.  ^_^

 

Remember every time you get a climb gradient, just multiply that factor to your ground speed. That will give you your required rate of climb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this something real pilots do even if they are using a sid and VNAV?


Vernon Howells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VNAV doesn't do you much good if the aircraft doesn't have the performance to perform the SID as published. 1200 ft/min rate of climb isn't a problem in a 737 though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this something real pilots do even if they are using a sid and VNAV?

Two things:

 

  1. VNAV has ZERO effect on climb performance over any other mode.
  2. Most airlines have engineering departments or a vendor that provides data that takes all of the climb performance parameters in to account. You only need to know the weather and runway conditions and the data will tell you what weight you can take off with with various flap settings. Some companies break it down by runway weight and climb weight and you choose the lower of the two.

Made up Eg. RWY 21, temp 25C, dry runway - you can takeoff at 169,000lbs. Are you below that? Great. Go.


Matt Cee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh i see so i won't need to do sums then what we've been discussing us that correct?


Vernon Howells

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh i see so i won't need to do sums then what we've been discussing us that correct?

 

Hehe... well, do you have an airline feeding you the performance data? ;) Seriously, it's all a matter of how far you want to go with this in your flight sim hobby. Maybe not that much in the beginning, then later you might want to go deeper and learn more about the technicalities and details.  

 

However, I think you will be fine without doing the the calculations, buddy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh i see so i won't need to do sums then what we've been discussing us that correct?

If you didn't have company-provided you would. But for the ease of day-to-day operations, no you don't do this in airline world.

 

Airlines typically know what places they fly to and will have everything ready to go for the crews. The dispatcher would look at the weather and the runway and say, "Flight 590, you're okay to fly at 170,00 pounds from runway 21 at International Regional Express Airport."

 

You'd take a look at the temps and weather once you get your final weights to make sure you're still good to go at 170,000.


Matt Cee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...