Pathetic: MH17 Crashed! Comments and Experience are needed.

[autopilot 3]

Hello, Guys!

 

As Flight MH17 has crashed from (probably) missile. Its mean commercial flight is unsafe on 33,000ft too? Too much pathetic. No safety of Aircraft at 33000ft. Its mean it'll be unsafe at at 40000ft too.

 

What do you say: At how much height a missile can hit the aircraft and at how much height a heavy kalashnikov can hit aircraft?

 

Your ideas and experienced needed,

 

Regards,

 

http://metro.co.uk/2014/07/17/flight-mh17-malaysian-airlines-passenger-plane-shot-down-over-ukraine-4801902/

[Bert Pieke 7,584]

It is going to change the way we view airline safety.

[goates 576]

An A-12, the predecessor to the SR-71, came home with missile fragments after being hit over Vietnam.

 

https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2013-featured-story-archive/pieces-of-history-missile-debris-from-a-12-oxcart.html

 

Surface to air missiles have long been capable of hitting targets well above 30,000 feet. What may have lulled people into a false sense of security in this case is that the shoulder launched missiles rebel groups typically have don't quite have the same range as the larger vehicle mounted models. However, it appears that in the Ukraine one of the groups has got their hands on larger vehicle mounted SAMs somehow.

[Glynn 405]

 

 

It is going to change the way we view airline safety.

 

It will if they continue to route flights over war zones, what lunatic thought that flying directly over the Ukraine when a civil war is in full swing was a good idea.

Lots of room for a negligence claim by the victims families right there.

[188AHC 2,138]

Guys, there is already a thread on this tragedy. Also, this doesn't belong in the Virtual airline forum so I'm combining it with the existing thread.

[AVSIM Admin 4]

This is an automatic message.

 

This topic has been moved from "Virtual Airlines News and Discussion" to "Hangar Chat". This move has been done for a number of possible reasons.

• The most likely reason is that the post was off topic.
• The topic could also have contained images or a video that were not appropriate to the original forum it was posted in.
• The images might not have been "illustrative" or "explanatory" in nature.
• The topic could have been moved because we deemed it to be more appropriately placed elsewhere.

Please ensure that your posts are "on topic" and contain illustrative images or videos as appropriate. Do not post videos or images just for entertainment purposes anywhere but in the screen shot or video forums. See our image posting rules here.

 

Members who continue to post off topic posts can be denied entry to specific forums in order to reduce and remove the practice. Your cooperation is appreciated.

[Marek2704 6]

Buk missiles can shoot down plane flying even on 25.000 meters (82.000 ft) :(

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buk_missile_system

 

"Buk" means beech (a kind of tree) in english.

[SolRayz 392]

I'm not sure why there was any question considering the infamous Francis Gary Powers high altitude U2 was shot down by Russian missle back in 1960. That was purportedly at over 70,000 ft.

[megs8888 20]

Close this post.

Close this thread

[Glynn 405]

 

 

Close this post.
Close this thread

 

Why ?

[Jim Young 2,356]

We already have a topic running about this tragedy.  Topic locked.