FlyTampa-Copenhagen Released

[Waterside 4]

With Vidan Sonderborg, Bornholm and Aarhus this opens up for some fantastic Danish domestic ATR flights! Stunning! 

P.s now we only need good ATR

[messifan10 3]

my fps is really good all maxed out.

[Boeing or not going 578]

Better than the EKCH on Simmarket? I have v3 and it includes a lot of objects in the surrounding area. I too am waiting for CYYZ.

[thepilot 565]

Who's to say it's CYYZ? Might as well be CYTZ...

[krazyk 157]

No FPS loss here either (FSX) with everything checked except 2048x textures.

Very well done and I think it deserves the FlyTampa tag, whether or not it was developed in house.

[klamal 282]

Just arrived on my first flight into this new airport and it is great!  Performance is excellent, even on my "old" system.  Though, I did not enable all options in the scenery config, nor did I use 2048 textures(though this impacts VAS more than frames).  I had the Scansim one prior to this and this is definitely better!  Tons of buildings in the Copenhagen area too.  Happy to have bought it, no doubt!

[CFIJose 5,485]

No FPS loss here either (FSX) with everything checked except 2048x textures.

Very well done and I think it deserves the FlyTampa tag, whether or not it was developed in house.

IMHO it's not worth the FlyTampa brand. Sorry!

[ryanbatc 12,774]

What is the difference between people who say it's poor on fps it's easy on fps?

 

To do a proper test you need to run unlimited fps with default then reactivate the addon scenery.

 

If you're locking at 30 you won't know if you lose fps because you probably have a monster system.

[Vargveum 53]

"SAS Tehchical Services" on the hangar sign.... ouch. Other than that I think it is great

[CFIJose 5,485]

"SAS Tehchical Services" on the hangar sign.... ouch. Other than that I think it is great

Emil is already fixing some issues. Amazing!

 

Please post on FlyTampa forum.

IMHO it's not worth the FlyTampa brand. Sorry!

Not right now. But once all issues are fixed, it will be.

[ZKOKQ 984]

Tip of the day. Please state what flight sim you are using. P3D or FSX. So those that are reviewing and having fps issues, we the reader know which sim has the issues.

Appreciate the reports coming in.

[Boeing or not going 578]

IMHO it's not worth the FlyTampa brand. Sorry!

 

 

Not right now. But once all issues are fixed, it will be.

 

I know people post with alts on the internet... but on a fight sim forum? You replied to your own post.

 

Suspicious.

[klamal 282]

I'm using FSX. Performance as I said before was great for me. Even with a system that I think may be considered on the low end by today's standards.

[ZKOKQ 984]

 

 

Suspicious.

Nothing suspicious about DJ, what on earth are you going on about

[CFIJose 5,485]

I know people post with alts on the internet... but on a fight sim forum? You replied to your own post.

 

Suspicious.

I was not able to edit my original post.

Did not mean deceive.