Flysimware's Cessna C441 Conquest ll out now

[zmak 331]

Thanks You gave me a good idea and I may take you up on that but I just want to try something first. I use Simstarter and I create different start profiles for my planes and I can set eng volume for the J41 so Im off for a flight and to give it a try

[CoolP 283]

I use Simstarter and I create different start profiles for my planes

Now that's a nice feature indeed. Didn't think about that one. Thanks for the HU.

[Gregg_Seipp 565]

Looks like a really well done plane!  (But they're going to have to make it allow people to have RXP and/or the GNS650/750.)  Please, don't do all that work and then skip that important step.

[CFIJose 5,485]

This vc looks better:

 

http://www.orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/74301-three-from-me/?hl=%2B441+%2Bconquest+%2Bii#entry681316

[stans 702]

This vc looks better:

 

http://www.orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/74301-three-from-me/?hl=%2B441+%2Bconquest+%2Bii#entry681316

Extensive use of 2D gauges and avionics in the Flight 1 C441, which does make it easy to bang in your own avionics, but the Flight 1 C441 was developed for FS9 and modified to work in FSX.   From the reviews I read, it lacks a lot of systems modeling and nothing on the switch panel on the left side of the cockpit is functional. 

 

Flysimware's GNS-530 is based on the stock, MicroSoft GPS, but with 3D knobs and a variable intensity back lighting.  It's a cute feature, but it would have been real nice if they had included an additional model with a flat space on the panel so the user could easily install whatever avionics they desired, similar to what MilViz did with their Cessna 310R.

[simmerhead 885]

Doesn't look all that great in the graphics department, but it's alovely aircraft IRL, so I might not be able to resist it

[james42 257]

Very tempting. Hows the night lighting ?

[Boeing or not going 578]

I emailed the dev about RXP support and he said they were looking at both the Aerosoft GTN750 and Reality-XP. That would be great

[RobdeVries 28]

Flight1 you mean

[~Craig~ 10]

Just to note that the videos shown at the beginning of this thread are, as far as I can tell, the old vids from 3 months ago ........ the release version has some improvements to texturing, including the black glareshield cowelling in the VC, which I believe is quite considerably improved.

[Avi8tor1 1]

Just to note that the videos shown at the beginning of this thread are, as far as I can tell, the old vids from 3 months ago ........ the release version has some improvements to texturing, including the black glareshield cowelling in the VC, which I believe is quite considerably improved.

 

 

I really hope so. From the "under the hood" perspective this is one of the best turboprops produced for FSX. It's just unfortunate the texturing both external and internal look pre-2008.

[Lmaire 38]

Just to note that the videos shown at the beginning of this thread are, as far as I can tell, the old vids from 3 months ago ........ the release version has some improvements to texturing, including the black glareshield cowelling in the VC, which I believe is quite considerably improved.

Could you post some screenshots or a video to see how the VC looks? Thanks.

[~Craig~ 10]

Could you post some screenshots or a video to see how the VC looks? Thanks.

 

I'm not at home for a few days now (no flight sim access), but here's a pic from their release, that I think shows an improved glareshield cowelling;-

 

[Glynn 405]

 

 

but here's a pic from their release, that I think shows an improved glareshield cowelling;-

 

Bit hard to tell, given that it is in the dark

[Purr 111]

Looks like a lot of care and attention to detail in this aircraft! Been looking at the videos--really close to buying this one but wondering if there are any other reviews out there yet?

 

Alex