Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
karmelk

Honking horn sound

Recommended Posts

I would love to hear the logic on that whole fiasco.

It dates from the days of the original 737 with a basic electro-mechanical aural warning unit. Unless the air sensing logic fails the takeoff config warning can only occur on ground so doesn't conflict with a cabin altitude alert. So there should be no confusion, in theory.

ki9cAAb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It dates from the days of the original 737 with a basic electro-mechanical aural warning unit. Unless the air sensing logic fails the takeoff config warning can only occur on ground so doesn't conflict with a cabin altitude alert. So there should be no confusion, in theory.

In theory. Tell that to Hans-Jürgen Merten from Helios 522. He thought it was the take-off config horn. I'm heading in to the sim on Sunday and I think one of the problems we'll deal with at some point is a air/ground fault. Config horn blaring at you until you can figure out a solution. I don't think it involves the O2 mask. ;)

 

It would make more sense to have the Landing Config horn and the Takeoff Config horn the same and the Cabin Alt different.


Matt Cee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory. Tell that to Hans-Jürgen Merten from Helios 522. He thought it was the take-off config horn. I'm heading in to the sim on Sunday and I think one of the problems we'll deal with at some point is a air/ground fault. Config horn blaring at you until you can figure out a solution. I don't think it involves the O2 mask. ;)

 

It would make more sense to have the Landing Config horn and the Takeoff Config horn the same and the Cabin Alt different.

Indeed. Logically the crew should think "we're in flight, it's most likely to be a cabin altitude problem". Logic goes out the window with that deafening horn going of course. Even so, if it is a cabin altitude problem you can cancel it using the overhead horn cutout button. If it's TO config warning it can't be cancelled unless you set a TO config or reduce thrust lever position.

 

I would have though your first action should be to try and cancel the horn. If it won't cancel then it's a config warning problem, otherwise work on the cabin pressure issue.


ki9cAAb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a moment I recall and then miss ######ing Betty from the MD-11.


Dan Downs KCRP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed. Logically the crew should think "we're in flight, it's most likely to be a cabin altitude problem". Logic goes out the window with that deafening horn going of course. Even so, if it is a cabin altitude problem you can cancel it using the overhead horn cutout button. If it's TO config warning it can't be cancelled unless you set a TO config or reduce thrust lever position.

 

I would have though your first action should be to try and cancel the horn. If it won't cancel then it's a config warning problem, otherwise work on the cabin pressure issue.

I'd rather not have to figure out which warning it is. One for Cabin Alt and a different one for the configs.


Matt Cee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 


I'd rather not have to figure out which warning it is. One for Cabin Alt and a different one for the configs.

 

At least now you have a light to tell you which one it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather not have to figure out which warning it is. One for Cabin Alt and a different one for the configs.

Pushing the horn cutout switch is that difficult? Boeing in their wisdom decided it was important to keep the same aural warnings to minimise differences between versions. It was exactly the same aural warning logic on the 727 and 747 Classic. Keeping the legacy design was probably a big mistake. They should have gone for a new layout and modernisation along the lines they did with the 747-400 and McDD did with the MD-95. They would still have retained the same type certificate.

 

The real problem in the Helios accident was that the crew did not consider the possible alternative, even when the cabin oxygen deployed. They were fixated on it being a configuration warning. However by then hypoxia had taken hold.

 

However since Helios a mod has been available to install warning lights which identify the reason for the intermittent horn. Don't Alaska Airlines have this mod?

 

http://www.b737.org.uk/pressurisation.htm, search for "Cabin Altitude Warning" (about two thirds of the way down the page.


ki9cAAb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 


At least now you have a light to tell you which one it is.

 


However since Helios a mod has been available to install warning lights which identify the reason for the intermittent horn. Don't Alaska Airlines have this mod?

 

Some of the planes do. Alaska has -4, -7, -8, and -9. I think only the later -8s and -9s have them and some of them came from Boeing installed incorrectly and are placarded inop. We still read AD2008-23-07 every day and won't stop until the entire fleet is fitted with the lights.


Matt Cee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this interesting... a typical general aviation pressurized aircraft has a light but no audible per FAA certification requirements.  At least the ones I'm familiar with.  Of course, a C-414 takes much longer to climb through 10,000 LOL.


Dan Downs KCRP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 


I find this interesting... a typical general aviation pressurized aircraft has a light but no audible per FAA certification requirements. At least the ones I'm familiar with. Of course, a C-414 takes much longer to climb through 10,000 LOL.

 

I suspect that has to do with the service ceiling being lower on the GA aircraft.  The time of useful consciousness at FL410 is a lot shorter than at FL250.  Without the audible warning you wouldn't stand a chance if you had a rapid depressurization at the higher altitudes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that has to do with the service ceiling being lower on the GA aircraft.  The time of useful consciousness at FL410 is a lot shorter than at FL250.  Without the audible warning you wouldn't stand a chance if you had a rapid depressurization at the higher altitudes.

That makes a lot of sense.  I lost pressure at FL230 and the Chancellor is not a dive bomber, it took forever to get below FL190 where I started feeling better about the outcome.  That was  interesting... yeah, the masks were in a bag somewhere.  I do remember the physiological sensations, mild ear clearing, but not the light; so yes, a horn is a good idea.  We had an altitude chamber at Offutt AFB back in my time there....that is something I recommend to anyone who has the access. Oh yes, I remember calling in my immediate descent to Memphis Center who was real quick at clearing me lower but I was already gone (as the song says).


Dan Downs KCRP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...