Various shots in Prepar3D V3

[Zuendholz 50]

Approaching Weeze

 

 

 

Approaching Rhodes

 

And Bologna

 

 

All shots taken in P3D v3, with the PMDG 737, FTX Global, openLC, Bologna from aerosoft, Weeze from aerosoft.

 

Every flight was done with FS2Crew Reboot SOP3 and for Ryanair Virtual.

[bernd1151 5,849]

Beautiful shots, Philipp

[keithb77 308]

But aren't these really shots of 'PMDG 737, FTX Global, openLC, Bologna from aerosoft, Weeze from aerosoft.'?

I suspect the P3Dv3 component is minimal and similar shots could be taken in FSX/P3Dv2....

If so - how different would they be?

Cheers

Keith

[Ed_S_Pilot 227]

Look great!

[Zuendholz 50]

Thanks guys.  

 

But aren't these really shots of 'PMDG 737, FTX Global, openLC, Bologna from aerosoft, Weeze from aerosoft.'?

I suspect the P3Dv3 component is minimal and similar shots could be taken in FSX/P3Dv2....

If so - how different would they be?

Cheers

Keith

 

The P3D v3 component is huge! I maxed out every Autogenslider, have overall great performance, no VAS issues at all and I haven't edited the pictures (just removed the red EZDOK logo and the parking break logo)

[rototom 198]

Zuendholz, on 18 Dec 2015 - 09:51 AM, said:

 

Thanks guys.

 

 

The P3D v3 component is huge! I maxed out every Autogenslider, have overall great performance, no VAS issues at all and I haven't edited the pictures (just removed the red EZDOK logo and the parking break logo)

False!

 

This is easily achievable in FSX. I see it all the time. And I didn't have to pay $200 for an FSX patch. I've never had an OOM in 5 years of FSX.

[Zuendholz 50]

Good for you.  

 

And now edit you post please!

[A320FAN 370]

Nice shots!

[TheNerd 12]

False!

This is easily achievable in FSX. I see it all the time. And I didn't have to pay $200 for an FSX patch. I've never had an OOM in 5 years of FSX.

While that may be true, P3D has way more autogen and a substantially better framerate, plus cloud shadows, HDR , and more

[Pugilist2 878]

+1.  P3Dv3 is beautiful.  Excellent shots!

[Zuendholz 50]

Thank you very much.  B)

[BadKarmaPT 48]

Very nice mix of shots!

[rototom 198]

While that may be true, P3D has way more autogen and a substantially better framerate, plus cloud shadows, HDR , and more

 

Except that when you change the time from night to day or vice versa, you'll have wait for the sim to reload the textures. That's how you know that it's not full HDR. Really, you're just getting bits and pieces of improvement at $200 a pop. Imagine if Microsoft was still selling new versions flight sim and they said the next version was going to be $200. Would you be happy with what you got? Personally, I would expect something built from the ground up. It's a bit of a joke really.

[Zuendholz 50]

Can we please go back to the "screenshots"? Keep the Prepar3D vs FSX discussion outside this thread, thank you.

 

I really don't care if you like P3D or not! 

[rototom 198]

Can we please go back to the "screenshots"? Keep the Prepar3D vs FSX discussion outside this thread, thank you.

 

I really don't care if you like P3D or not! 

 

Sure, the screens look great! because of the add-ons.