Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Pe11e

737-800 Q&A

Recommended Posts

Not sure how you’re coming up with 5-10 minutes. The TAS difference at cruise altitude between .77 and .78 is only about 6 knots. When cruising at more than 7 miles a minute that’s under 2 minutes for a 2 hour flight.

 

Keep in mind the other side of the CI ratio is fuel. If the CI of 10 used less fuel than a straight .78 cruise at a cost of only 2 minutes the airline bean counters might consider it a win. On the other hand if your aircraft is wet leased those 2 minutes might mean more since someone else is paying the fuel bill. In reality neither the time or fuel values change too much on a per flight basis, but when you scale it to an entire fleet it can make a huge difference.


Brian W

KPAE

Share this post


Link to post

Thanks for your clarification, it's now much more logical to me, and on top of all I can rely on PFPX again. :)
I'm not sure neither how I managed to come up with 5-10 minutes. 

 

That is exactly the reason I want to use CI, to save the money using FsPassengers. I guess I can stick with CI 20, which is low cost. Who uses CI 10 or 5? I heard that Ryanair uses CI 5?


Current system: ASUS PRIME Z690-P D4, Intel 12900k, 32GB RAM @ 3600mhz, Zotac RTX 3090 Trinity, M2 SSD, Oculus Quest 2.

Share this post


Link to post

Optimum CI is a function of fuel cost, time cost and fixed cost - If fuel cost is high and time cost is low as is the case with most LCC, then CI would be low. Supposedly real-world airlines had tools to calculate them, but I'm just parroting what I heard.

 

EDIT: Too low a CI would result in a considerably slower cruise speed closer to those of Classics', and probably annoy enroute ATCO's in busy sectors as they try to fit an aircraft cruising at .75 into a stream of other narrowbodies cruising at .78-.79. Way much better than VLJ's cruising at .55 up to FL410, but still...I think I once read something about that.

Share this post


Link to post

 

 


Way much better than VLJ's cruising at .55 up to FL410, but still...I think I once read something about that.

 

Believe it. This picture was taken at FL390 on a good day. 

FB5TQ4H.jpg?1


Joe Sherrill

Share this post


Link to post

That's a good tailwind, at least...Still somewhat faster and much higher than most turboprops. Guess that's how most of them sold.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...