Have Anyone Here flown into FlyTampa Toronto CYYZ without OOM?

[TszChun 0]

AIRAC cycles do not cause memory leaks. I believe memory leaks are caused by certain missed approach procedures at a certain runway at certain airports. Please see post #1 of this thread - http://www.avsim.com/topic/468259-07may15-detailed-discussion-of-resolved-777-vas-leak/?hl="memory+leak" - for what a memory leak is. Kind of makes you want to stay away their new EHAM. I would like get it but ...

To make it more accurate, the navdata contains head-to-radial-intercept missed approach at certain airports which causes memory leak.

 

Anyway, I found that the memory does not leak anymore after I got Aerosoft MA EDDF v2 uninstalled. The sim just leaked vas along the flight from LOWW to EGLL even though EDDF was not orgin nor destination...

[Jeeeno 314]

I have both Toronto and EHAM flytampa. Didn't test in Toronto, but I tested the PMDG 777 in EHAM and it's quite risky to get there even using medium settings (I'm using FSX SP2). At TOD I was at 2,6GB and I ended at gate with the aircraft shut down with 3,8/3,9 GB with the ding ding in the background. I'd like to underline the fact that in many other airports with payware sceneries I can use the 777 and stay well below the VAS limit.

[pcubine 143]

I think I will stick with Aerosoft's EHAM and all of it's fault. I don't need to spend 28 Euros on a new set of faults.

[Jeeeno 314]

28€ plus VAT and from my side all thrown away ...

[Boeing or not going 578]

28€ plus VAT and from my side all thrown away ...

Did you install the light texture pack for EHAM? - David Lee

[Jeeeno 314]

Did you install the light texture pack for EHAM? - David Lee

 

Reading through FT forum people who have tested with LITEX, didn't show much improvement. So I didn't download them.