FS2004 R22 Strobe Light Fix

[Kyrelel 1]

Yes, I know this is old, but in case anyone stumbles across this while searching for a fix, as I did, then note that the light IS a strobe, and so the correct fix is in post #3

 

 

EDIT:  Link to post#3 - http://www.avsim.com/topic/28681-fs2004-r22-strobe-light-fix/#entry175175

Edited July 23, 2016 by Jim Young
added link

[cmpbellsjc 2,960]

Does this apply to FSX? As you noted this is a super old thread, 13 years old and before FSX was out and was for FS9 not FSX.

[Jim Young 2,356]

Digging up old topics is necroposting and not considered appropriate on the Internet (not just this website).  I split the topic from the old posts and edited the topic to show a link to "post #3".

 

Also moved the topic to the FS9 Forum.

[vector 7]

I often read up on material relating to FS2004 and flightsimming in general which is many years old.  I am not that clever or knowledgable to say that I know it all or havent't forgotten some thing or another.  If a friend pointed out an article to me which was ten or twelve years old and which helped me then I wouldn't castigate him, or her.  Rather, I would thank them.

 

Who, I wonder, decides what is, or is not, appropriate on the Internet in such a case and why should we follow that decision like a herd of cattle?

 

Dijvid.

[Jim Young 2,356]

I will let the following link answer your question - http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=necroposting

[A32xx 129]

From the Urban Dictionary definition: "On a message board, posting something irrelevent on a really old topic to bring it to the top of the list topics."

 

This post is not irrelevant, it is correcting some incorrect information in the earlier post.

[Jim Young 2,356]

I'm the moderator.  The post was irrelevant!!!  Plus, in the OP, I placed a link to the topic.  What's wrong with that?

 

Topic closed because we have some who desire to troll.