Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Murmur

Some cloudscapes

Recommended Posts

 

 


15 fps @10% clouds @LFLP with rain is not bad.

 

In X-Plane, anything below 20 FPS is unflyable, because time slows down and even aircraft systems may react weird. You absolutely need to keep your FPS above 19, even in bad weather with lots of clouds.


Mario Donick .:. vFlyteAir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In X-Plane, anything below 20 FPS is unflyable, because time slows down and even aircraft systems may react weird. You absolutely need to keep your FPS above 19, even in bad weather with lots of clouds.

 

I know, currently I don't have a system to run the clouds especially Murmurs. without clouds even with W2XP (excluding HD + UHD Meshes) runs around 25 fps. And high settings and no HDR.


Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, currently I don't have a system to run the clouds especially Murmurs. without clouds even with W2XP (excluding HD + UHD Meshes) runs around 25 fps. And high settings and no HDR.

My clouds + scripts should give better fps compared to default clouds. How are your fps compared to default clouds?


"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." [Abraham Lincoln]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My clouds + scripts should give better fps compared to default clouds. How are your fps compared to default clouds?

 

I really don't remember but it was not good, I started using 3jclouds script and then I found Default CLouds Enhancer and with it I can keep the rendering to 50% clouds and 22-25 fps also depending on the area , I like what your clouds and script does but if a thick layer of cloud is there then it will be 10 fps.

 

Stratus and Cumulus overcast usually gives terrible fps with the default XP clouds.

 

I tried at PAWG with NOAA and with default clouds 1st , the clouds were like this :

 

 

Cumulus broken

 

Cumulus SCT

 

Cumulus SCT

 

  with the default clouds and not using scripts 12 fps

 

  with you script 8 fps but I feel there are more clouds forming with your script.


Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's strange, my clouds should give higher fps. Real terra haze could also interfere with cloud puffs size and decrease fps.


"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." [Abraham Lincoln]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's strange, my clouds should give higher fps. Real terra haze could also interfere with cloud puffs size and decrease fps.

 

 

Nah, I don't use RTH.

 

I can try again later today.

 

Let me re-update XP10 , then using the default clouds again I will check and then I will copy your clouds and check.


Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Murmur

 

 Went to PAGY after updating XP10 again and it asked me to overwrite the cloudsxxx.png which I did, but I had forgotten that yorur .dds clouds are still present.  Guess XP10 will pickup .png first

 

@PAGY with NOAA weather was Cumulus Broken and with the default XP10 clouds 17 fps .

 

Then deleted the all clouds and re-copied your .dds files and again @PAGY same weather condition 12 fps :sad: , so I thought maybe your clouds.lua may help , after copying and reloading .lua file I got 9 fps.

 

Now the strange thing, as the tests carried out were within a couple of minutes of each other with NOAA as the weather engine , what surprised me was the default XP10 clouds were forned very differently, but your clouds (without the LUA ) looked more

 

I am not using any other scripts with FlywithLua.


Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Murmur

 

 Yep better now, at least in the current weather scenario, 3-4 fps better. If I OC my GPU to it's correct speed I will gain 7-8 fps just by OC'ing. will fly around more to check.


Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3-4 fps better than before, or better than default?


"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." [Abraham Lincoln]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3-4 fps better than before, or better than default?

 

better than default.


Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Murmur

 

Cumulus Broken somewhere over LOKL Austria @FL90 NOAA weather pretty smooth for my system

 

Hughes_500D_1.jpg


Ryzen 5 1600x - 16GB DDR4 - RTX 3050 8GB - MSI Gaming Plus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...