BEV US/Canada-Fall, on the way

[Trans_27 Pilot Chase 59]

just saw this at flight1.http://www.flight1.com/products.asp?product=bevvol2ucabout time... i been tired of summer.. :)

[Guest Paul Heaney]

Yeah they did that ##### Backwards.

[kerosene31 349]

Good news! According to their forums, the config program took a lot of time. Now that it is finished, the rest of the textures should be out much more quickly. Can't wait to try out fall!

[Trans_27 Pilot Chase 59]

yea, their website says that only 2 to 4 problems were found since yesterday (if i remember right), and that they plan for release tomorrow morning. :-jumpy

[LAdamson 240]

Good! I've always prefered the Rocky Mtn. area of the western U.S. in the fall!L.Adamson

[Guest]

great news! I'll be up early and ready for it!

[Trans_27 Pilot Chase 59]

Haha, alex... Ill be up with you bro! :-wave

[moss1 11]

I am interested in this one as well. I see the new configurator has 512X512 texture options. The summer set made my sim studder too much. Maybe this is the answer. I have a video shoot tomorrow...darn it. Has to wait until Sunday I guess. Best regards, Jeff

[Guest]

I could be wrong, but wouldn't a 512x512 set be higher resolution and make stutters happen more often?

[Trans_27 Pilot Chase 59]

thats what i thought...video shoot ehh? What line of work are you in? :-wave

[moss1 11]

Hey everyone, I thought the default BEV autogen reloaded textures were 1024, and hearing the new configurator has a 512 option, this would perform better? But who knows...FS9 drives me nuts. When it works, it works great. When it decides to get under my skin...you know what follows. Anyway, I am in Video Production. I do Commercial,Corporate, Music,and tomorrow, the dreaded private affair. I like to changes thing up. Not to get off topic, but I was looking to produce a high end video of a few select aircraft. There is a new module out, and I was wondering if the files could be converted to MPEG4 for streaming, or any other video format? I am looking at the Eaglesoft, Carenado, Dreamfleet, and Flight1 so far. I am looking to go all the way in producing something never done before. I am planning on starting a new post asking for suggestions for which aircraft people want to see the most, as well as for simmers looking to buy a new product, but want more than just screen shots. I love what I do, and putting this together for everyone to see would be so rewarding for me. I quess it's a way of giving back to the community. So back to the textures... I assume 512 will perform better? Have a great night everyone. Best regards, JeffEDIT: Most importantly, I will, of course get permission from the developers to make the videos. I'm not sure if there is any rules out there for doing what I am planning.

[Guest]

sounds like an interesting line of work Jeff.Anyway, that would make sense, if the textures are 1024 then 512 would reduce stutters.one thing you might want to look at is your texture_bandwidth_multi= setting in the fs9.cfg file. Sometimes a number thats too high leads to stutters, and too low leads to very long texture loading.I have a very fast computer, but this number works perfectly, I have NO idea how someone found it out!TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=16776704

[Trans_27 Pilot Chase 59]

hmmm... whats your specs alex?Jeff, no permission is required to create a video using their aircraft. Atleast not that i know of. To me, that would mean getting permission to post a screenshot. Lol. :-hah:-wave

[Guest]

Windows XP ProAMD FX-55RADEON X850 XT1gb ddr4000 ramSONY CPD-G520 21" monitor running 1600x12004x AA 16x AFEpox nforce4 ultra motherboardcreative sb audigy 4200gb sata drive

[Trans_27 Pilot Chase 59]

*looks at alex's specs then looks at own specs and hangs head in disapointment*i think ill go to bed now...