Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Pete Dowson

Help: BIOS settings wanted for better performance from a Z170 mobo system

Recommended Posts

1. You said you have an Asus board. Do you know which one? It will have AiSuite 3. Within AiSuite 3 you will find Five Way Optimisation, unless it's a cheaper board. 5WO will do it all for you, including overclocking your RAM, so it's not necessary to enable the XMP profile. However, you can certainly try the XMP profile afterwards if you desire. My experiences of Five Way Optimisation are here...

 

Ah, thanks for that. My mobo is the ASUS MAXIMUS VIII HERO, and, yes, I did install and use AiSuite 3. I let it get as far as it wanted -- eventually it fails and reverts. I think that was at 4.8. So it left it at 4.7. it was only later, when running FSX or P3D that I got blue screens occasionally, and reverted to 4.5. (I could have gone to 4.6, but I was playing safe -- anything to avoid blue screens!

 

I uninstalled AISuite because I couldn't find any other way of getting it's damned fax coontrol selection graphic off the screen -- even stopping its services loading didn't seem to help!

 

But it is easy enough to reinstall and let it try again.

 

2. TPU 1 and TPU 2 switch on the motherboard. By flipping this switch to TPU 1 you will get 4.4 GHz. By flipping it to TPU 2 you will get 4.6 GHz. Be warned though, it's a one size fits all generic overclock with a voltage that Asus deem will work for most people. It's not 100% guaranteed to be stable for those that have chips requiring very high voltage.

 

 

Hmm. That's interesting. I might try 4.6 that way before installing AIsuite again.

 

3. For manual overclocking it's quite straightforward. Nothing fancy required.

 

Follow the easy Asus guide and you should easily achieve 4.6, perhaps higher. Stress test with ROG RealBench, that's all you need for 100% stability. My UEFI settings aren't really relevant, as there's not much in there that isn't default. What is in there that's not default is no different to the settings that are adjusted in the Asus guide below. Asus auto rules are actually very good these days. So the myriad of settings in the UEFI are mostly fine left on default. 

 

Ah, good. That's a relief then. I might try that too -- first perhaps, after your last statement.

 

Thank you very much! That's a very helpful post! ;-)

 

To all posters:

 

After all the reports and responses above, for which thank you all very much, I have discovered a few more things.

 

I found that my Sisoft Sandra was woefully out of date, so I downloaded the latest version and reran the tests. The results are a bit better:
 
Memory Latency : 19.0ns
Bandwidth Single-threaded, Aggregate Memory Performance : 30.18GB/s
Bandwidth Multi-threaded, Aggregate Memory Performance : 38GB/s
 
I also ran AIDA64 on the recommendation in one of the posts above. That’s different again. It  seems to be giving 44.3GB/s for bandwidth (reading only, but better), but 48.1nS for latency.
 
Now I'm not sure which is okay or whether I've still got a memory bottleneck!
 
Pete

Win10: 22H2 19045.2728
CPU: 9900KS at 5.5GHz
Memory: 32Gb at 3800 MHz.
GPU:  RTX 24Gb Titan
2 x 2160p projectors at 25Hz onto 200 FOV curved screen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you have two clocks and they disagree, you need a third clock. :)

 

Cheers!


Luke Kolin

I make simFDR, the most advanced flight data recorder for FSX, Prepar3D and X-Plane.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth investigating, but I wouldn't be concerned about Sandra's results.

 

I would overclock as far as the silicone lottery and your cooling allows and enjoy the new PC.

 

These benchmarks can scare you into thinking you have a problem when you don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone finds a way of keeping Asus AI Suite running, WITHOUT that damn onscreen graphic that Pete referred to, please post it, as I find Asus Fan Xpert brilliant for TOTAL fan and water pump control. MUCH better than Corsair Link.

Nice PC build Pete - almost the same as mine;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprised to see a guru like you Pete not making sense of computer stuff - but find it comforting too :) 

 

ASUS AI Suite used to be terrible - my computer is 5 years old so things might have improved - but I always OC directly from the BIOS. I like to know what's going on with my computer and take the time to learn what all the settings do. 

 

Corsair RAM has mixed reviews, so I wouldn't be surprised if it underperforms. I've been a happy Corsair user myself for years, but will try some more high end stuff in my next build. 

 

With new RAM modules you are advised to test the modules to make sure they function properly. 


Simmerhead - Making the virtual skies unsafe since 1987! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone finds a way of keeping Asus AI Suite running, WITHOUT that damn onscreen graphic that Pete referred to, please post it, as I find Asus Fan Xpert brilliant for TOTAL fan and water pump control. MUCH better than Corsair Link.

Nice PC build Pete - almost the same as mine;-)

 

Are your results better than mine? If so, how did you do it, please?

 

 

Surprised to see a guru like you Pete not making sense of computer stuff - but find it comforting too :) 

 

ASUS AI Suite used to be terrible - my computer is 5 years old so things might have improved - but I always OC directly from the BIOS. I like to know what's going on with my computer and take the time to learn what all the settings do. 

 

Corsair RAM has mixed reviews, so I wouldn't be surprised if it underperforms. I've been a happy Corsair user myself for years, but will try some more high end stuff in my next build. 

 

With new RAM modules you are advised to test the modules to make sure they function properly. 

 

Ah, but I'm a programmer, not a hardware expert. I used to understand the hardware before it got so complicated and full of new terms I don't know.

 

ASUS AI Suite used to be terrible - my computer is 5 years old so things might have improved

 

Actually I just reinstalled it and re-ran it, but changing the strting settings a bit as another poster mentioned above. It went quite well, an it's given my what looks so far to be a stable 4.7GHz. I had to go back into the BIOS and reenable XMP mode again to get the memory speed correct, but apart from that I'm quite happy with it -- except for that non-removeable icon it sticks on the screen!

 

I reran the benchmarks and got further improved results. Still not sure whether that's it though, r whether I've still got something wrong.

 

With new RAM modules you are advised to test the modules to make sure they function properly. 

 

The supplier is supposed to do that! I think they did.

 

Regards

Pete

 

P.S New benchmark results (at 4.7GHz and 3200 MHz RAM):

 

Sandra

  memory benchmark multi-threaded:    37.8 GB/s

  memory benchmark single-threaded:  30.2 GB/s

  memory latency:                                  18.8 nS

 

AIDA64

  memory benchmark (read):                 44.4 GB/s

  latency                                                 47.7 nS

 

For latency they surely must be measuring different things?

 


Win10: 22H2 19045.2728
CPU: 9900KS at 5.5GHz
Memory: 32Gb at 3800 MHz.
GPU:  RTX 24Gb Titan
2 x 2160p projectors at 25Hz onto 200 FOV curved screen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete, there is a simple intel tool i use to check memory bandwith and latency, no installation needed https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intelr-memory-latency-checker#download

 

For overclocking, i wouldn't use asus tools. OC was stable, but utility was setting Vcore to high - far more then needed, and well over the limits for my CPU. Maybe that changed in new versions, i didn't tried it for more then 4 years. I would go with this metod https://rog.asus.com/articles/guides/guide-overclocking-core-i7-6700k-on-the-maximus-viii-extreme/

 

Some useful info on CPU / troubleshooting:   http://www.overclock.net/t/1570313/skylake-overclocking-guide-with-statistics  (i would check general recommendations(for voltages and bios settings)here, no need for extreme stress testing, Real Bench is just enough).

 

Hope this helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The supplier is supposed to do that! I think they did.

 

Regards

Pete

 

I'd be surprised if they took the time. It takes a while... 


Simmerhead - Making the virtual skies unsafe since 1987! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be surprised if they took the time. It takes a while... 

Agree. My supplier has done many things wrong, like GPU in wrong slot(lower performance). After i checked / reconnected everything, even my temps went 20c lower becouse of cable management and airflow  :smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 


Are your results better than mine? If so, how did you do it, please?

 

Hi Pete

Although i have AI Suite installed, I don't use it for overclocking, so can't really compare.  I only some of its other features like Fan Xpert

 

I currently have my cpu at 4.8ghz and have XMP on profile No.1 (the only one in the Corsair RAM;-)

 

The EUFI BIOS looks a little frightening when first looking, but I found only 2 or possibly three changes need to be made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete

Run some different memconfigs , only run Aida64

Run a Asus Extreme VIII all tests at 4.7ghz

Not now if it help

My eng is very bad but the screen talk for itself.

Nice comparison, Hasse. Should be very useful for Pete and anybody with a rig similar to his.

 

Greg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete, there is a simple intel tool i use to check memory bandwith and latency, no installation needed https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intelr-memory-latency-checker#download

 

Hmm. It looks interesting though rather technical. Not sure I'll understand the things that seems to display. there's a lot of them!

 

I was really only looking for 1 figure for bandwidth and one for latency, and then only because it was suggested I should check them, and when I did and showed them it was further suggested that I need to try to do something about improving them before messing more with Prepar3D to get rid of the stutters and hesitations.

 

Unfortunately, whilst various things like more overclocking and better memory settings have improved the original figures, this seems not enough.

 

For overclocking, i wouldn't use asus tools. OC was stable, but utility was setting Vcore to high - far more then needed, and well over the limits for my CPU. Maybe that changed in new versions, i didn't tried it for more then 4 years. I would go with this metod https://rog.asus.com...s-viii-extreme/

 

 

 

I looked at that, but thought I'd try the utomtic method again first. This time, because I think of different choices made before starting it, it seems to have done very well -- and even the temperatures seem fine. I can't manage 4.8 like you, but 4.7 was more than before. The only thing it did wrong was reset the XMP option so my memory was back to 2933 instead of 3200 where it should be. I've rectified that anyway now.

 

Hope this helps

 

 

Yes, thanks. At least it is interesting. I still would love to know what bandwidth and latency figures you managed to get, though for comparison I suppose they'd need to be from the same tool -- i.e. Sandra or AIDA64, or the one you just pointed me to if you also tel me which figures I should look at or what parameters I should use.

 

Regards

Pete

Hi Pete

Run some different memconfigs , only run Aida64

Run a Asus Extreme VIII all tests at 4.7ghz

Not now if it help

My eng is very bad but the screen talk for itself.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/dz0owf6q7gjskbl/aida-6700.png?dl=0

 

 

Thank you! I see you have the full version of AIDA64. Might be useful too.

 

Gives me more to think about! ...

 

Regards

Pete


Win10: 22H2 19045.2728
CPU: 9900KS at 5.5GHz
Memory: 32Gb at 3800 MHz.
GPU:  RTX 24Gb Titan
2 x 2160p projectors at 25Hz onto 200 FOV curved screen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think you mean ns (nano-seconds) not ms (milli-seconds) ... RAM access measured in ms would be extremely slow.  Are you sure you're testing memory bandwidth and not something else?

 

Sorry Rob meant nano seconds of course.

So getting close to exact same values as martin-w.

 

gb.


YSSY. Win 10, 6700K@4.8, Corsair H115i Cooler, RTX 4070Ti, 32GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200, Samsung 960 EVO M.2 256GB, ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger, Corsair HX850i 850W, Thermaltake Core X31 Case, Samsung 4K 65" TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The EUFI BIOS looks a little frightening when first looking, but I found only 2 or possibly three changes need to be made.

What were they?


 i7-6700k | Asus Maximus VIII Hero | 16GB RAM | MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X Plus | Samsung Evo 500GB & 1TB | WD Blue 2 x 1TB | EVGA Supernova G2 850W | AOC 2560x1440 monitor | Win 10 Pro 64-bit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...