Hard to believe, EZdok V2 close.

[TheFlightSimGuy 514]

After seeing how support over the last 6 years with EZdok has been, there is no way I will touch another product from them. Chaseplane all the way.

[Samaritano 304]

I heard about chase plane but I don't like the fact that an internet connection is required to use the program. I'm going to wait for EZDok v2 and see. Still on version 1 and for me it works.

[nealmac 260]

Yeah, Ezdok works for me too, but it's ridiculously buggy. And temperamental. Oh yes. Extremely temperamental. Sometimes it just doesn't work, for no other reason other than it just feels like it. Thankfully I'm having less of these incidents since the last update.

 

I would have no hesitation buying a new version of Ezdok if it were more stable and had proper support for it. Obviously time will tell if this is to be the case. But for now I'll stick with 1.187 or whatever it is.

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

Well, I was about to buy ChasePlane the day the alpha came out but luckily I found out before I did that they don't support TrackIR yet. I'm also using EZCA v1 for years now and although it has many drawbacks I'm still loving it and can't imagine flying without it. So, for me it's pretty simple.. if EZCA v2 comes out before ChasePlane supports TrackIR I'm going with EZCA, if ChasePlane supports TrackIR before EZCA comes out I'll go with ChasePlane. I won't buy both for sure because I don't see any point in that.

[gboz 157]

if EZCA v2 comes out before ChasePlane supports TrackIR I'm going with EZCA, if ChasePlane supports TrackIR before EZCA comes out I'll go with ChasePlane. I won't buy both for sure because I don't see any point in that.

 

Looks like you are going with ChasePlane then.....

https://fsfxpackages.com/en/blog/2016/12/27/chaseplane-alpha-1-5/

 

gb.

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

Looks like you are going with ChasePlane then.....

https://fsfxpackages.com/en/blog/2016/12/27/chaseplane-alpha-1-5/

 

gb.

Well, it appears so I thought TIR support will come out at the end of January but this is great news! ChasePlane it will be than.

[penta_a 428]

EZdok 2 official release date 03 Jan per their web site.

 

http://www.simforums.com/forums/ezca-v2-announcement-here_topic57108.html

[ajaybala 66]

ver 1.8.7 has been totally bug and crash free for me other than a simconnect message which only comes when fsx takes long time to start due to an internal dialogue. will upgrade to ver 2.0 once out.

[Samaritano 304]

Great. Thanks for the update. Can't wait to get it.

[Gregg_Seipp 568]

I do wish they'd release before the holidays are over but, yes, this is great news.

[anden145 2,285]

Too late for me. Using ChasePlane now - and I am really glad to have it. Works perfectly.

So no need to go back to EZDok. I always hated this software....

 

Have also switched to ChasePlane and I'm quite satisified. I think, I'll skip EzDok for now... would check out, if there's an upgrade path for existing customers, though... 

 

After seeing how support over the last 6 years with EZdok has been, there is no way I will touch another product from them. Chaseplane all the way.

 

Exactly... agreed!

[Gregg_Seipp 568]

 

 

Have also switched to ChasePlane and I'm quite satisified. I think, I'll skip EzDok for now... would check out, if there's an upgrade path for existing customers, though...

 

I would have probably tried Chaseplane as well.  I've said it elsewhere that the cloud thing just gave me a nope.  So many things can go wrong setting up a flight and now they add Internet, server availability, DNS to it?  Gosh, I'd just think there are better, more practical ways to accomplish the antipiracy they're after.  Brilliant user interface and a nice looking package otherwise.  Anyway, to each his own. 

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

I would have probably tried Chaseplane as well.  I've said it elsewhere that the cloud thing just gave me a nope.  So many things can go wrong setting up a flight and now they add Internet, server availability, DNS to it?  Gosh, I'd just think there are better, more practical ways to accomplish the antipiracy they're after.  Brilliant user interface and a nice looking package otherwise.  Anyway, to each his own. 

I think you worry a bit too much about that Internet thing.

[officercrockey 196]

I think you worry a bit too much about that Internet thing.

 

I don't think he does. I was left the last 4 month without internet because of my great internet provider. The good thing was: I could fly anyway. I could not imagine how it would have been without a working camera tool, which is essential.

[Tomaz Drnovsek 440]

I don't think he does. I was left the last 4 month without internet because of my great internet provider. The good thing was: I could fly anyway. I could not imagine how it would have been without a working camera tool, which is essential.

If you put it like that, you're absolutely right. I made a mistake of looking at the issue from my point of view.. in the last, I dunno, 6+ years my internet was out for about 10 minutes.. combined! So I never had this problem and I live in eastern Europe. If I think about it now, they probably should implement an offline option for cases like that. The reality of things is that if pirates want to crack something they usually do no matter the protection measures taken by the developer so at the end the legit user gets the short end of the stick. But still, if you have a reliable internet connection I don't think you have much to worry about but nonetheless an offline option would be nice.