Flytampa/FSDG EHAM and the NGX WIP pictures

[PAINMAN 33]

 

 

 

[Kenzo 24]

Nice screenshots! May I ask how ft Schiphol is fps wise?

[PAINMAN 33]

Depends on the traffic ai load.

If you raise the bar high you will struggle.

I have the ai at 50 % and I'm having around 20 to 30 fps.

A little lower in rush hour

[Farlis 2,277]

Depends on the traffic ai load.

If you raise the bar high you will struggle.

I have the ai at 50 % and I'm having around 20 to 30 fps.

A little lower in rush hour

 

You have to switch AI traffic completely off to give a valid answer to performance.

[PAINMAN 33]

Well I don't know exactly what fps I do have without the ai.

But it's more anyways I can tell you that, and offcourse it depends on your system.

My system is probably not the same as his and my other settings are probably not the same as any one else.

[Kenzo 24]

Well I don't know exactly what fps I do have without the ai.

But it's more anyways I can tell you that, and offcourse it depends on your system.

My system is probably not the same as his and my other settings are probably not the same as any one else.

I know you cant compare, but I was hoping to get to know if it runs bad compared to any other addon scenery on tour system, since the aerosoft version was kind of FPS heavy no matter what Specsavers you have.

[cmpbellsjc 2,960]

Depends on the traffic ai load.

If you raise the bar high you will struggle.

I have the ai at 50 % and I'm having around 20 to 30 fps.

A little lower in rush hour

You have it set at 50% but didn't mention what AI traffic your using. WOAI, MTX or UT2.

 

Is this FSX or P3D?

[Hoang 108]

Very nice, waiting for the comparison with the Aerosoft product!

[PAINMAN 33]

I'm using WOAI and it's in p3d.

I didn't own aerosofts EHAM so I can't compare the 2 sorry.

My computer is quite old and it runs just fine so if you have a high end PC I don't see why it shouldn't run great

[him225 51]

from the screenshots seems lacking in color fidelity than FT's other works.

 

have become bored of EU/US airports though that many have been done twice, wonder why no quality developer is yet covering FIMP, WSSS, FAOR and the likes.

[cmpbellsjc 2,960]

I'm using WOAI and it's in p3d.

I didn't own aerosofts EHAM so I can't compare the 2 sorry.

My computer is quite old and it runs just fine so if you have a high end PC I don't see why it shouldn't run great

That's good to know and might explain some of the FPS hit you get. As you may know or WOAI uses FS9 models which will work but are not as efficient as using FSX native models. Also WOAI flight plans are (often) compiled using the 1% density setting for airliners which means that setting your slider to 50% is the same as setting it to 100%, unless you recompiled the flight plans and changed the density settings.

[PAINMAN 33]

I havent recompiled anything so its all "straight out of the box".

Lacking in colour? my screenshots are taken straight from the sim with Active Sky 2016 real world weather and it was gray and rainy when the shots were taken.

And remember these shots are taken with an early beta and does not represent final product.

 

 

A nice day shot in comparison.

[Zangoose 1,631]

from the screenshots seems lacking in color fidelity than FT's other works.

 

have become bored of EU/US airports though that many have been done twice, wonder why no quality developer is yet covering FIMP, WSSS, FAOR and the likes.

 

I can see where you are coming from but I think a lot of people have been waiting for a new version of EHAM due to how bad performance wise the Aerosoft one is.

[him225 51]

do you have hdr turned on, that could be downing the colors

[mvisch 3]

Do you have any higher res screens by any chance?

 

Seems the quality is quite poor on those small shots, to me it looks like aerosofts version from here