February 9, 20179 yr I have a 970 dont see any performance issues with Vram going over 3.5? its subtle, but its there, I got one too. Windows 11 - Samsung 990 Pro M.2 | Asus Prime Z690 | i7 12700KF HT | DeepCool LS520 SE | MSI 5070 Ti Ventus OC | 64GB G.Skill XMP II | Lian Li 216 LANCOOL RGB | TrackIr v5 | Honeycomb Alfa - Bravo - Charlie | MSFS 2024 - Samsung 990 Pro M.2 | Curved 27" MSI | JBL Quantum 810
February 9, 20179 yr Another GTX 970 data point here: System: i7 6700 4.0 GHz, 32 Gig RAM, running Windows 10 Monitor is at 1920x1200 resolution Threaded Optimization Off in Nvidia control panel X-Plane settings: Visual Effects - High (HDR) Texture Quality - High Antialiasing - 2X SSAA+FXAA Number of World Objects - Maximum Reflection Detail - Minimal Draw shadows on scenery - Off With that setup, I'm getting frame rates of 40 fps or better, over most of the scenery I fly. Sometimes it dips down to the mid 30's over a dense urban center, but never below 30 fps. It shoots up to 50-60 fps over ocean or clear sky over a cloud deck. I could probably bump one of those graphics settings up a tick or two and still stay above 30 fps, but I like having 40 fps as my usual lowest frame rate. It's just comfortable overhead. I'm keeping an eye out for Nvidia's next series of cards, but I'm happy with what I'm getting in XP11 on my GTX970 for now. I'll upgrade when I see something with 8gb VRAM where the price is right. If the OP is getting such drastically lower frame rates, I'd suspect either Threaded Optimization is on, or there are too many resource hog apps running in the background. I do try to keep my system fairly stripped-down for extraneous apps that don't need to be running all the time. X-Plane and Microsoft Flight Simulator on Windows 10 i7 6700 4.0 GHz, 32 GB RAM, GTX 1660 ti, 1920x1200 monitor
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.