Flying with live traffic!

[kiek 1,213]

1 hour ago, MarkW said:

Is there no way to find another data source that is cheaper or free?  I see that Lorby-SI has a similar program using live traffic and his data source is free.

No there is not. And RealTraffic is getting better and better. 5.04 together with my 7.0 provide you the option to set time back up to 48 hours. RealTraffic provides the historical traffic data including the historical QNH data (world wide)

You cannot compare the program you mentioned with my program. Did you try it?

 

[MarkW 1,491]

No did not try it was just wondering if the data is available for a lower cost. 

[Guevorkyan 69]

Question regarding the AI_Liveries.txt generation.

Despite what the VRM Generator says, a lot of liveries aren't written into the AI_Liveries.txt, despite not encountering errors. Could it be because those not written down are the ones without regs in the flightsim section?

 

Sorted: Had to dig a bit deeper into the VRM Generator txt to find some discontinuity in the flightsim sections

[Avirtualpilot 2]

Hi Nico, I ask you a help to identify what's wrong in this aircraft.cfg:

 

The aircraft is the Boeing 717.

General section.

[General]
atc_type=BOEING 
atc_model=717
editable=1 
visual_damage=1
performance=Only experienced AI pilots should attempt to fly this aircraft. 

If I set the atc_model 712, the VMR says invalid aircraft code in the txt.

If I set the atc_model 717, the VMR block itself ad apperas this message in the bottom: invalid char filename argument

What to do?

Thanks

 

 

[ZKOKQ 984]

28 minutes ago, Avirtualpilot said:

Hi Nico, I ask you a help to identify what's wrong in this aircraft.cfg:

 

The aircraft is the Boeing 717.

General section.

[General]
atc_type=BOEING 
atc_model=717
editable=1 
visual_damage=1
performance=Only experienced AI pilots should attempt to fly this aircraft. 

If I set the atc_model 712, the VMR says invalid aircraft code in the txt.

If I set the atc_model 717, the VMR block itself ad apperas this message in the bottom: invalid char filename argument

What to do?

Thanks

 

 

Should be B712

 

[General]
atc_type=Boeing
atc_model=B712
editable=1
visual_damage=1
performance=Only experienced AI pilots should attempt to fly this aircraft.
Category=airplane

[kiek 1,213]

atc_model=B712

 

Nico

[Avirtualpilot 2]

OMG, I've noticed I've put all the atc ids of an aircraft company in the sim line! Here the problem!!!! Didn't notice!

Thanks for the help

[Avirtualpilot 2]

Hi again, I've a question I'm sure you can gimme an answer.

 

What line I've to look at for having the same description of the aircraft, or company as I've indicated in the rectangular?

Many thanks

[kiek 1,213]

Sorry, but I do not understand your question ...

[ZKOKQ 984]

6 hours ago, kiek said:

Sorry, but I do not understand your question ...

I think he means "Why can't I get my AI planes to read ( in Sim) eg: United 293 KIAD-EDDF...or maybe not. Question is ambiguous.

[Avirtualpilot 2]

Sorry, try to explain better.

As you can see, the description of every aircraft is not the same of earch other, for model, type ecc.

Es.

The first one is A320 and stop, below appears A320-200. Then some 737-700, other one is 737-300 winglet, another one is 737-300 logolight. Some has the "boeing" word before the model, others no.

These descriptions I'd like to modify

I'd like to have the same description of each aircraft, so my question is what line I've to re-write in the fltsim?

Title?, Description? Is a combination of different lines? If yes, whats?

Thanks for the help

[Jim Young 2,356]

This topic is locked as the OP represents advertising on AVSIM which violates our Terms of Service.  We do allow members to post information about a new product with links to more information about the topic but not links to any store or site where you purchase the product.  I have therefore also removed the links in the OP.  Beta testing of commercial products is not allowed in any case.  Would we allow, for instance, REX, PMDG, AS16 developer's to beta test a new product in our non-commercial forums?  I think not.

If members are interested in this product, they can search for the payware site to buy a license.

[Jim Young 2,356]

Since it has been proven to me this product is freeware (but may require a commercial license), I am unlocking this topic. 

[pmb 5,137]

Thanks Jim, much acknowledged.

Kind regards, Michael

[kiek 1,213]

On 31-8-2017 at 10:27 AM, Avirtualpilot said:

These descriptions I'd like to modify

I'd like to have the same description of each aircraft, so my question is what line I've to re-write in the fltsim?

You should modify the 

ui_type=

field in each [fltsim.x] section such that you use the same strings for the same types.