Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HiFlyer

P3d v3 VS. P3d v4 *Performance Faceoff and Side by Side!*

Recommended Posts

There are options inside the simulator, don't worry.

  • Upvote 1

CASE: Louqe S1 MKIII CPU: AMD R5 7600X RAM: 32GB DDR5 5600 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS DX11 · Windows 11

Share this post


Link to post

Thank you Nuno for those wonderful news.

One thing less to worry about about. Now there's only only one left I guess... :males:

Share this post


Link to post

Does v4 with increased LOD radius get rid of the monotonous landclass texture pattern visible from cruise in some parts of the globe?

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Hoang said:

I care, I still want to know how much memory the sim uses.
 

Physical memory usage (VRAM and system RAM) yes, but VAS is a meaningless measurement with v4. We have something like 16 exabytes of address space now, which is an unfathomable amount that nothing is going to exceed.

  • Upvote 1

Ryan Maziarz
devteam.jpg

For fastest support, please submit a ticket at http://support.precisionmanuals.com

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, him225 said:

Does v4 with increased LOD radius get rid of the monotonous landclass texture pattern visible from cruise in some parts of the globe?

No, you will just see it spread out even further all around, to get rid of it you need better landclass than the default.

Share this post


Link to post

I was thinking of upgrading from 8 gig of memory to 16.  Add in a few add ons and a browser and it may not be enough.  It seems that 32 may be better way to go.  


10700k / Gigabyte 3060

Share this post


Link to post
41 minutes ago, Tabs said:

We have something like 16 exabytes of address space now, which is an unfathomable amount that nothing is going to exceed.

8MB is all the RAM anyone will ever need... ;-)


spacer.png


 

Share this post


Link to post

Unfortunately the RAM prices explodes these days. For example i bought 2 fast 8GB DDR-4 3200 modules for 85 Euro 10 month ago. Now they are at 140 Euro :angry: .

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, PhugoidEffect said:

v4 seemed more GPU intensive to me. I just hope my 1080 running 4k handles it good.

It generates more FPS as CPU providing more = more performance needed on GPU side.

Share this post


Link to post

This demo has absolutely zero value to me. :biggrin:

Show me how the sim performs with the NGX from FSDT's KLAX to FB KSFO in the FTX regions with high settings and LOD to the horizon.

Oh wait! You can't demo such a scenerio since the NGX is not available and the regions have not be optimized for v4.

I hope you can tell how pumped I am to try that flight. :biggrin:

  • Upvote 4

A pilot is always learning and I LOVE to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
4 hours ago, Hoang said:

I care, I still want to know how much memory the sim uses.

As much as it needs, until it approaches your physical RAM capacity, I would hope.

It's actually better to leave things in RAM that might be needed again rather than just dumping them to "save RAM" as soon as you don't need them anymore... you don't need to reload them when (if) you do need them again.  It's only when the program needs to load something and there's no room for it should the application start dumping things it is unlikely to need again.

If you have 16 GB of RAM and you've been flying for hours, I'd say P3D is managing memory poorly if it's not allocating 15 GB or so.  Empty RAM is wasted RAM.

From a performance standpoint, good memory management is always using all of it.

Share this post


Link to post

I don't care at all. If it climbs to 14GB or something like that, i'll just buy 32GB and forget about it

Is it not good programming practice to make your code as efficient as possible?

  • Upvote 2

Christopher Low

UK2000 Beta Tester

FSBetaTesters3.png

Share this post


Link to post
6 hours ago, TheFlightSimGuy said:

Probably that God awful orbx so cal.

If you think about it, assuming that ORBX stuff came from V3, I would say P3Dv4 now is getting sloppier in unloading objects.  10GB of RAM? That's insane.  64 bit does not mean you suddenly not care about memory.  The stutters also confirmed my suspicion that performance wise, the improvement is marginal.  I am waiting for tomorrow, when more people have a chance to see for themselves.


Vu Pham

i7-10700K 5.2 GHz OC, 64 GB RAM, GTX4070Ti, SSD for Sim, SSD for system. MSFS2020

Share this post


Link to post
40 minutes ago, RoboRay said:

From a performance standpoint, good memory management is always using all of it.

You probably are not a software developer to say that.  64 bit or not, memory needs to be managed efficiently, leaving only items that are improving performance and that's all.  Using all of it is just bad coding.  


Vu Pham

i7-10700K 5.2 GHz OC, 64 GB RAM, GTX4070Ti, SSD for Sim, SSD for system. MSFS2020

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...