Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
citationjet

HD Mesh V3 necessary?

Recommended Posts

Hell guys, just a quick question as i saw different postings and answers in the web. Is the Mesh HD V3 necessary if i use Ortho4xp or not? 

Thx for your help in advance

Cheers, 

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Ortho4XP creates it's own mesh. X-Plane displays only one mesh for a given place, whichever is higher in the scenery_packs.ini file.

Now, I'm not sure if during the creation process you can reuse the overlay elements like roads, forests, autogen from HD mesh V3. Someone else might answer to this more precisely.

Pascal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Pascal. I read several times that users both use HD Mesh plus Ortho4. Lets see the other replies 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pascal is correct.  Ortho4XP generates its own Mesh from 3rd party data retrieved during the tile creation of the mesh (step 2 during o4xp tile creation).  

I personally use the default X-Plane 11 Global Scenery to generate the overlays as I believe that they contain later OSM data than alpilot's HD Mesh v3 (he did mention his intent to update HD Mesh to v4 with later data - see here).  If you want HD Mesh v3 as your base Mesh you'll have to use g2xpl to generate your tile instead.  Do t this you'll have to backup the original and overwrite the DSF with the HD Mesh v3 one in Global Scenery first then create your tile as g2xpl grabs the DSF from the Global Scenery folder.  Then after the tile is generated, copy the original DSF back into Global Scenery (you will now have a g2xpl tile that you can dump into Custom Scenery).


Regards,

 

Daniel Du Preez

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thx for the explanation. So i will keep using the XP Global Scenery as you mentioned it and use Ortho Mesh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would stay clear of HD Mesh since the OSM data is long in tooth. Also when you use the HD mesh in SOCAL it turns the scenery into a dessert with very little vegetation.  


AMD Ryzen 7 1800x, 1080GTX, Ram - 32GB, 32" 4K Monitor, WIN 10, XP-11 !

Eric Escobar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know why large cliffs appear at certain parts of my Ortho (that aren't present in real life)?  I'm just using the default global scenery mesh I believe.


| FAA ZMP |
| PPL ASEL |
| Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | EVGA GTX1080 Ti | 32GB 5600 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X |

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, strider1 said:

I would stay clear of HD Mesh since the OSM data is long in tooth. Also when you use the HD mesh in SOCAL it turns the scenery into a dessert with very little vegetation.  

I don't know if it's a different method being used, but I still find HD Mesh to look more accurate even if the roads aren't as up to date.

For example, in the stock XP11, there's zero city buildings in Jackson, MS. With HD Mesh, they are there (a representation at least of a downtown with higher buildings). Same for several other cities in the SE US I've flown to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So for Ortho4XP overlays what configuration you chose at 6m32s in the video ? In the video it seems to use default.

 

I find HD mesh V3 necessary to get better overlays, mainly better defined roads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, bonchie said:

I don't know if it's a different method being used, but I still find HD Mesh to look more accurate even if the roads aren't as up to date.

For example, in the stock XP11, there's zero city buildings in Jackson, MS. With HD Mesh, they are there (a representation at least of a downtown with higher buildings). Same for several other cities in the SE US I've flown to. 

Another big difference with UD and UHD mesh is more accurate and detailed boundaries in landclass like farmland and forests (in theory, anyway). Also more sharply defined mountain features, and better rivers and coastlines, so you don't get as many straight lines and triangles at the water boundary. Since I fly more in remote areas and not so much over big cities, I'll take those features over more up-to-date OSM roads.

I don't know how this impacts Ortho-based scenery since I don't use it.


X-Plane and Microsoft Flight Simulator on Windows 10 
i7 6700 4.0 GHz, 32 GB RAM, GTX 1660 ti, 1920x1200 monitor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...