Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mikebxb

C441 great plane

Recommended Posts

With the startlocks engaged the blades are at a completely flat pitch. (depending on the air and cfg file this doesn't necessary happen at 0 deg).

If you apply power (the powerlevers aren't locked IRL) the prop RPM will increase, but the blades remain at a flat pitch and basically no torque is being generated.

That's what can make taxiing interesting IRL, if one prop comes of the startlocks and the other one doesn't.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, J35OE said:

With the startlocks engaged the blades are at a completely flat pitch. (depending on the air and cfg file this doesn't necessary happen at 0 deg).

If you apply power (the powerlevers aren't locked IRL) the prop RPM will increase, but the blades remain at a flat pitch and basically no torque is being generated.

That's what can make taxiing interesting IRL, if one prop comes of the startlocks and the other one doesn't.

So, what's unrealistic about their implementation then?


Gregg Seipp

"A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane.  A great landing is when you can reuse it."
i7-8700 32GB Ram, GTX-1070 8 Gig RAM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, J35OE said:

With the startlocks engaged the blades are at a completely flat pitch. (depending on the air and cfg file this doesn't necessary happen at 0 deg).

If you apply power (the powerlevers aren't locked IRL) the prop RPM will increase, but the blades remain at a flat pitch and basically no torque is being generated.

That's what can make taxiing interesting IRL, if one prop comes of the startlocks and the other one doesn't.

 

Unfortunately, FSX/P3D does not allow direct manipulation of beta angle.  It comes as a result primarily from fuel flow.  So without building some complicated .dll, restricting fuel flow is the only way it can be simulated.  I have the RABZAM Metro, but I haven't flown it more than a couple of times.  I will look later but my guess is that they use a .dll that we can't see into to control the start locks. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Gregg_Seipp said:

So, what's unrealistic about their implementation then?

The powerlevers are locked and the blades aren't at a flat pitch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, J35OE said:

The powerlevers are locked and the blades aren't at a flat pitch.

Thanks.  That explains it.


Gregg Seipp

"A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane.  A great landing is when you can reuse it."
i7-8700 32GB Ram, GTX-1070 8 Gig RAM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@whamil77

Here's a pretty good video that might help you.

 

  • Upvote 1

Jesse Cochran
"... eyes ever turned skyward"

P3D v5.3 Professional, Windows 10 Professional, Jetline GTX, Gigabyte Aorus X299 Gaming 7 mobo, i7 7740X @ 4.9 GHz, Corsair H115i Liquid Cooling, 32Gb SDRAM @ 3200MHz, Nvidia GeForce GTX1080Ti @ 11 GB

ORBX Global + NALC, ASP3D, ASCA, ENVTEX, TrackIR, Virtual-Fly Yoko Yoke, TQ6+, Ruddo+ Rudder Pedals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...