VR is great but it's not my thing

[OldFlyboy 30]

Inside the cockpit it is truly wondrous. I felt that I was back inside some of the planes I've flown. However, I cannot manage a long flight with the gear. As fascinating as VR is I'm back to plain old flight and my full Oculus Rift/Touch combo is listed in the For Sale forum

Neal Howard

[hs118 707]

Got to agree with you. VR in current state does one thing VERY well...simulate the visual sensation of flight. This is very powerful and satisfying in the short term.

However, VR in its current state falls VERY short of simulating a more complete pilot experience that includes ATC, use of charts, etc. and other aspects unrelated to the strictly visual sensation.

Edited October 9, 2017 by Henry Street

[pracines 823]

Agreed that the various tasks like chart reading is problematic, but I cannot totally ditch the technology. The feeling of being there is, like you said, truly wondrous. I do both, and enjoy flying both ways. VR is likely here to stay, and as it remains, it will only get better. This situation is not unlike when the first PC's started to hit the stores in the 1980's - not very popular at first, but I had to have one. I used pen and paper at that time too, but now using pen and paper is quite rare. VR could turn into "holodecks" eventually, and its neat to be a part of the holodeck ancestry. 

[GCBraun 2,390]

I heard the same reaction when virtual cockpits started to appear: “not really intended for serious simmers”, “difficult do read”, etc. Let’s see how it turns out this time. :)

[JLSeagull 191]

1 hour ago, Henry Street said:

Got to agree with you. VR in current state does one thing VERY well...simulate the visual sensation of flight. This is very powerful and satisfying in the short term.

However, VR in its current state falls VERY short of simulating a more complete pilot experience that includes ATC, use of charts, etc. and other aspects unrelated to the strictly visual sensation.

Have you watched Laminars' most recent presentation on their proposed VR implementation in 11.10?

Have a look at the second video on this page;

https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/130527-latest-sticky-1110-beta-due-soon/&page=2

[HiFlyer 9,343]

I also keep in mind that VR is essentially about a year old (that's about when the oculus first arrived) and as usual, flight simulation is near the bottom of the barrel as far as implementation of the technology.

Pretty much, the days of Flight simulation being on the cutting edge are gone, and it's probably going to be a while before simulation catches up with this technology; most especially if we are mostly using sims that are in no way shape or form designed to take such tech in mind, and are essentially shoehorning in the tech.

In the meanwhile, it's probably a catch 22. Developers will ignore the tech until it reaches critical mass, and it will take much longer to reach critical mass if users don't see developement of things to satisfy their needs. (Vr charts, etc)

And round and round it goes.

As usual, it's the military sims that are running with this stuff, and DCS, IL2, War Thunder and etc leave "pure" simulation in their dust in almost every regard, here.

It might end up being left to Aerofly, Flyinside simulator, Remex, and others to be the future of this technology for flight.

 

[ComSimPilot 623]

I tried the rift last year as well in P3D for two weeks and I also returned it in the end and bought a 34" Ultrawide monitor. I think no-one disagrees that the future is in VR. The sensation and feeling of dimensions can't be reproduced in a monitor. However while its the way to go, I can't say the time is now. In my opinion a good monitor is far better for the serious simmer. One problem is how to read charts fast. Another is how to read the displays and gauges. If you are not in FS just to enjoy the feeling of flying, but you like to take it seriously and fly by the book, you need to monitor your instruments continuously. The resolution of VR right now is not sufficient to resolve these indications. You need to lean-on the instruments to see for example your exact airspeed or any other instrument or panel indication. That is very unrealistic and not practical to me. In a monitor you have in a glance a reading of any instrument indication instantly, like in real life. Also, in VR when looking out in the distance I could not make crucial details for any flight, like where is the runway or even where is the airport. When we have a headset with at least a 2K equivalent resolution and hardware can support it for the high fps needed in VR, then it will be the time to transition. 

[SpiritFlyer 987]

Have to agree with everything said here.

Although the extra-sensory world of the rift is enticing, my 55 inch curved screen at 4K with TrackIR does it (half-way) close enough for me, for now...

That will change as the next evolutionary enhancements in computerized substitutionary reality becomes readily available.

Ultimately VR will win the day.

Until then...

Kind regards,

[hs118 707]

1 hour ago, J.L.Seagull said:

Have you watched Laminars' most recent presentation on their proposed VR implementation in 11.10?

Have a look at the second video on this page;

https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/130527-latest-sticky-1110-beta-due-soon/&page=2

Encouraging for sure. All that head movement likely to cause vertigo :-)

Real world pilots and real world military pilots will tell you, they are routinely making notes and cross referencing materials while flying. Even tablets have not replaced this functionality in cockpits.

No doubt VR technology will catch up to deliver a much fuller simulation of pilot experience but honestly I don't see it happening in the hobby community any time soon. Hobbyists are generally not trying to replicate real world pilot experience (or at least not trying the parts they don't like :-) )

[warbirds 555]

I am a fan of VR and, as I said several times in many post here, I was making virtual cockpits when all others were flying panels and telling me I was a bit daft, and I used LCD widescreens when all others laughed me out of the forums saying the tube is forever. Sure the first steps are ragged and rough but hang in there and in a year or two most of you will be flying in VR.

VR has it's  place in flightsims but not yet in the airliner pit,,more in the open cockpit, seats of the pants pit. I use it for the open cockpit Waco and use the 65 inch curved monitor for my heavies. 

I also use VR for other things such as racing games and open world games. 

It does have a problem though, the two friends I let try it took it off after a few minutes after becoming a bit ill. You have to use it like your in a real plane, or car. Just sit there and look ahead like normal because any fast turning movements to look behind  you or around you can initiate motion sickness. 

[jlund 380]

Is VR a bit like when 3D was the "new" best thing to happen for movies. No manufacturer of TV's would put a new model on the market without 3D, and look where it is today. I did some photography in 3D and it really gives a new dimension to it, but the fact that you have to put 3D glasses on everytime you should see them, made it a no no for me. So is VR out a little too early, and people not ready to invest in it yet. And can that hold developers back in making new an better (and cheaper) devices/glasses to be a fully integrated thing for flightsimming?

I have unfortunately never tried VR, but would really like to see what it feels and looks like with a flightsim, but as it is now (from what I have read and heard), it won't be a thing for me to invest in yet.

[warbirds 555]

 3d was a fad, a gimmick to sell more TV's and now Samsung does not even make a 3d TV anymore. 

[YukonPete 585]

I had and tried an OR CV1 but sold it after a month. It was terrible! Is it the future? Probably but it certainly is not here yet with the current versions. Give it another 5-10 years and I think it will probably start to dominate

[caaront 109]

A flat monitor is very dull and boring for me, except for making videos and taking screenshots.

 

I fly b y the seat of my pants, anyway, my instructor used to put his hand in front of the instruments and make me use the sun for direction, and feel in my butt when the plane was ready to fly.

[HiFlyer 9,343]

15 hours ago, warbirds said:

It does have a problem though, the two friends I let try it took it off after a few minutes after becoming a bit ill. You have to use it like your in a real plane, or car. Just sit there and look ahead like normal because any fast turning movements to look behind  you or around you can initiate motion sickness. 

I think I would be heartbroken if VR made me motion sick. Hearing some of the stories, and seeing some of the near instant reactions from some friends, I feel very lucky.

Interestingly enough, absolutely none of the kids I have let try my VR rig seem to have this issue, and take to it like fish to water.

Whereas I as I said, have had several adults nearly instantly wobble away, dazed and looking for a dramamine.

Hmmmmm......