Imaginesim LGA and Drzwiecki EWR

[Zimmerbz 160]

Question on both of these.  Are they accurate in terms of up to date terminal buildings, taxiways, rwy configs, etc?  I ask because at Imaginesim LGA, it seems as though the terminals don't match my charts exactly (runways and taxiways seem good) and at EWR, I always seem to get turned around and "lost" on their taxiways after I am certain I am following what is on the charts.  I figured I would check to see what the verdict is.  Thanks!

[DaveCT2003 1,820]

KLGA is under construction. Imaginesim's LGA is based on what the terminals will look like after construction is completed.

 

[fakeflyer737 991]

EWR is up to date, fps hog though

6700k oc 4.6 1080ti on 1440p

[Zimmerbz 160]

Thanks!

[downscc 1,327]

I removed DRZ KLGA the same day i installed it... his terminals predate what was there a couple of years ago.  The Imaginesim isn't great but it is good, they just have a problem with setting their airport elevation to zero instead of what it truly is and you have to turn water effects down one notch from full right.

[DaveCT2003 1,820]

1 hour ago, downscc said:

I removed DRZ KLGA the same day i installed it... his terminals predate what was there a couple of years ago.  The Imaginesim isn't great but it is good, they just have a problem with setting their airport elevation to zero instead of what it truly is and you have to turn water effects down one notch from full right.

 

Yeah, I did the same with DD LGA.  I forgot to mention the Airport Elevation issue with IS LHA, thanks Dan.