Direct Flightplans

[Christopher Low 5,332]

Can someone let me know how I enter a flightplan into the FMC when the departure or arrival airfield does not have any SIDs or STARs in the database? What do I use as a waypoint? Do I just look for one that is close to the airfield? In addition, I would like to be able to "bypass" multiple departure waypoints, and fly direct to the destination airport STAR. Is that possible? If so, how do I enter this into the FMC?

Sorry for the n00b questions, but I have very little experience entering flightplans into the FMC. I have completed the PMDG 737NGX Tutorial #1 flight from EGKK London Gatwick to EHAM Amsterdam Schiphol twice (plus the initial test where I had somehow deleted Amsterdam airport; I was on final approach to a big green field ), but the SIDs and STARs include multiple waypoints.

Any help greatly appreciated.

[Dave_YVR 968]

It's pretty basic, but you do need to know the fixes that you want to go to. Not every airport has SIDS or STARS, so it's fairly common to set up something like you are asking.

[downscc 1,327]

2 hours ago, Christopher Low said:

Can someone let me know how I enter a flightplan into the FMC when the departure or arrival airfield does not have any SIDs or STARs in the database? What do I use as a waypoint? Do I just look for one that is close to the airfield? In addition, I would like to be able to "bypass" multiple departure waypoints, and fly direct to the destination airport STAR. Is that possible? If so, how do I enter this into the FMC?

Sorry for the n00b questions, but I have very little experience entering flightplans into the FMC. I have completed the PMDG 737NGX Tutorial #1 flight from EGKK London Gatwick to EHAM Amsterdam Schiphol twice (plus the initial test where I had somehow deleted Amsterdam airport; I was on final approach to a big green field ), but the SIDs and STARs include multiple waypoints.

Any help greatly appreciated.

Hi Chris, I see you took my advice over in the P3D forum and asked here.  Dave was spot on, you need to have a plan or a route. The direct method of doing this is to become familiar with aviation charts, such as SkyVector.com or Navigraph Charts for desktop or cloud.  You should have a flightplan before you even start a session in the NGX, complete with route and altitudes.  Route planning can be as simple as you want to make it, as i mentioned in the P3D forum you only need an origin, destination and one enroute waypoint.  Please ask if you have specific questions on how to use the FMC, I'll gladly point you to the appropriate reference in the FCOM.  It is all in there.  If you need help with the basics of flight planning then your best place to start as a student pilot is the FAA Airman Information Manual (AIM), which was my bible when learning to fly: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/

[Spin737 102]

Normally a 737 would fly to an airport where there are approaches. You'd need to file your flightplan to a fix from where an approach to that airport can start. If there's a VOR on the field or nearby, there's probably an approach that uses that VOR to get you to a runway. Some large airports have STARs that serve many airports in that area.

Give us an example and we can let you know what to do.

[Christopher Low 5,332]

The first flight that I would like to try is EGPD Aberdeen to EGAA Belfast Aldergrove. I do not think that either of them have SIDs or STARs.

[Spin737 102]

1 hour ago, Christopher Low said:

The first flight that I would like to try is EGPD Aberdeen to EGAA Belfast Aldergrove. I do not think that either of them have SIDs or STARs.

Check out Flight Procedures for EGPD

http://www.ead.eurocontrol.int/eadbasic/pamslight-972E4F6C341681A186F0F520894959B6/7FE5QZZF3FXUS/EN/AIP/AD/EG_AD_2_EGPD_en_2017-09-14.pdf

That should get you pointed in the right direction and your transition to the enroute structure.

At EGAA, you could fly one of the approaches starting at BEL.

I'm not sure of preferred IFR routings in the UK, but I believe most people just look up common routes on Flightaware (?) for those city pairs.

 

 

[vc10man 732]

Christopher, if you have AivlaSoft's EFB like me, you can use it to (a) get you a flight plan, then(b) using EFB's Modify tab, select the SIDs and STARs you want and actually see a map layout of that before saving and exporting to a PMDG FMS or any other FMC. FlightSimCommander does the same too.

[Dave_YVR 968]

I was curious to try this flight EGPD to EGAA as I have the UK2K scenery for both but have never done the pairing. Simbrief gave me a routing of GOW UP600 TRN P600 BLACA to which I transitioned to SULEV for the RNAV Rwy07 at EGAA. Pretty straight forward.

[Christopher Low 5,332]

It may be pretty straightforward to you, but I am completely new to this. How easy will it be for me to input this data into the 737 NGX FMC? It should be OK if that information is already in the database. If it is not, then I need to know how to add it!

[roarkr 104]

Hi, Take a look at this short video

 

 

 

[Ralgh 43]

If you want to see an example of this look at the flight I flew yesterday, AAL 265. You can look up the route on FlightAware. There is no STAR to LIhue so they file us to MORKE which is on the approach. When we get back on radar near DENNS the controllers usually clear us direct NAPUA which is also on the approach. When we get close we typically get cleared to cross NAPUA at 3,000 feet and cleared for the approach to runway 35. 

[Nick Dobda 24]

Might be helpful to understand how ATC plays a role sometimes -

Sometimes I'll file a route (vatsim) where the last waypoint on the route will be some fix (be it a VOR, or an intersection or whatever) that is some distance from the airport. If the area is controlled ATC will vector me towards an approach. If there is no ATC available, I will self vector to whatever approach I choose. You don't always have to have a route from wheels up to wheels down.

Also weather permitting you could request a visual approach in which its nearly a free for all to get it down.

Now - I admit I could be wrong, I don't know the ins and outs - maybe there's some IFR rule or something where what I've said above is false. If so please correct me.

[downscc 1,327]

1 hour ago, Nick Dobda said:

Also weather permitting you could request a visual approach in which its nearly a free for all to get it down.

This needs a little explaining.  On an IFR flight plan, you can request a contact approach or you receive a visual approach.  As a student I remembered this because receive has a v in it as in visual. On requesting the contact approach, you are most likely familiar with area and are going to maintain visual flight rules and self navigate to the runway.  I believe most commercial carriers prohibit contact approaches and so you have to wait for ATC to offer the visual... and in most cases they want to give visuals because it helps tremendously to keep the flow going.  The alternative is to cancel IFR and complete your trip using visual flight rules but you loose out on ATC providing traffic separation so I doubt there are many cases where this is a good idea.

[Nick Dobda 24]

8 minutes ago, downscc said:

This needs a little explaining.  On an IFR flight plan, you can request a contact approach or you receive a visual approach.  As a student I remembered this because receive has a v in it as in visual. On requesting the contact approach, you are most likely familiar with area and are going to maintain visual flight rules and self navigate to the runway.  I believe most commercial carriers prohibit contact approaches and so you have to wait for ATC to offer the visual... and in most cases they want to give visuals because it helps tremendously to keep the flow going.  The alternative is to cancel IFR and complete your trip using visual flight rules but you loose out on ATC providing traffic separation so I doubt there are many cases where this is a good idea.

Thank you for adding / clarifying. I am just a simmer so I realize I could be wrong on a lot of my understandings.

I wonder - Southwest must be in that minority of allowing contact approaches - seems they are always requesting visual - and its really noticeable if you happen to live under a published approach - Southwest planes are always cutting in from the side where most others are in line.

[downscc 1,327]

1 minute ago, Nick Dobda said:

I wonder - Southwest must be in that minority of allowing contact approaches - seems they are always requesting visual - and its really noticeable if you happen to live under a published approach - Southwest planes are always cutting in from the side where most others are in line.

Could just be that they are coming from a different direction.  I don't think SWA uses contact approaches, it is more likely that ATC is handing out visual approaches, which is the norm.  On any day that it is VMC you can expect visuals even if you are on the same track as ILS because as long as you can maintain visual on the traffic around you ATC can space you closer together.

Where is the world are you Nick or what is the airport you are near?