E170/175

[OSJJ1985 134]

On 12/24/2017 at 2:42 AM, Ephedrin said:

KLM counts on the 737 too... and several others. It‘s still a very solid and economic airplane despite its age. And with the MAX there is no reason to replace it too soon.. Airbus is not god given though its FBW and auto flight system. There are pros and cons for both 737 and „A320 and similars“ and there are airlines that prefer one more... so it‘s still on the market.

Actually I'd say it's because Boeing doesn't have much (with that I mean just one) options left for x in 7x7

[Nighthwk 566]

5 hours ago, OSJJ1985 said:

Actually I'd say it's because Boeing doesn't have much (with that I mean just one) options left for x in 7x7

They have the 797, then of course the 77X, and any other expansions to their product line. They’ll milk it until the cow runs out of milk

[threexgreen 3,139]

On 12/25/2017 at 10:41 AM, OSJJ1985 said:

Actually I'd say it's because Boeing doesn't have much (with that I mean just one) options left for x in 7x7

Boeing 808. Oh dear.

[Baptista 49]

... "I'd personally LOVE to one of the 170-190 series and / or the new C-series."

 Ozires Silva defends Boeing-Embraer agreement.
This is largely responsible for our successful aircraft.
Please study this proposal with care.
Success and health in 2018

[mikea76 184]

On 12/25/2017 at 4:41 AM, OSJJ1985 said:

Actually I'd say it's because Boeing doesn't have much (with that I mean just one) options left for x in 7x7

they will never run out of boeings...   by the time they finish the 748 the NGX will be due for a remake..  then if the do a 787 the 777 will be in need of a update.  ETC... 

[StarBlue 27]

On ‎12‎/‎27‎/‎2017 at 1:03 PM, threegreen said:

Boeing 808. Oh dear.

You know I've wonder what will happen with Boeing numbers after the 797.  The number 8 is very lucky to the Chinese so does 808/818/etc look to be it, or maybe 7717 (remember they already used 7707).  Hmmmmm Boeing is about as tight lipped as RSR.  Maybe they mess with Airbus and do A360/A370.  Hahahaha

[Guest]

1 hour ago, StarBlue said:

You know I've wonder what will happen with Boeing numbers after the 797.  The number 8 is very lucky to the Chinese so does 808/818/etc look to be it, or maybe 7717 (remember they already used 7707).  Hmmmmm Boeing is about as tight lipped as RSR.  Maybe they mess with Airbus and do A360/A370.  Hahahaha

Yeah, you're right on that.

The prediction must be that at some point the Chinese will name it the T888, that, as you know, represents the luckiest combinations of numbers.

Interesting to be a spectator in these changing times...;-)

 

[Ephedrin 418]

There was also a 377... they have enough options. :D 

[FishermanIvan 110]

Most Boeing airplanes have 7 or a combo of 7 in the name. 

B-247, B377, B-17, B-29, B-52, KC-135, and now the C-17 I guess.  Those are just off the top of my head. 

[threexgreen 3,139]

19 hours ago, FishermanIvan said:

Most Boeing airplanes have 7 or a combo of 7 in the name. 

B-247, B377, B-17, B-29, B-52, KC-135, and now the C-17 I guess.  Those are just off the top of my head. 

This is brand new stuff for the conspiracy theorists!

[bbogdansk 7]

Is there going to be a moving map on the displays in the PMDG MAX?

FSX: Is there going to be 32-bit limitations with the NG3?

Will we see it in FSX?

[Guest]

1 hour ago, bbogdansk said:

Is there going to be a moving map on the displays in the PMDG MAX?

FSX: Is there going to be 32-bit limitations with the NG3?

Will we see it in FSX?

This is PMDG.

There will be no restrictions. It will be an exercise in pure perfection.

Or they won't release it.

(Karl will explain all one day...and maybe do a tutorial called 1.6)

IT WILL BE PERFECT.

[bbogdansk 7]

let's hope so!

[Ephedrin 418]

Really? They create a new addon in 2018/19 using the latest technology availeable through the P4D SDK and you want to use it on FSX? You‘ll limit it yourself with a 12/13 years old programm.

 

of course there are limitations.

[GCBraun 2,392]

3 hours ago, Ephedrin said:

Really? They create a new addon in 2018/19 using the latest technology availeable through the P4D SDK and you want to use it on FSX? You‘ll limit it yourself with a 12/13 years old programm.

 

of course there are limitations.

Unfortunately P3D is far from being the latest technology. Anyone that has flown other simulators know that. It is still FSX at its core. What makes it special are the addons, such as the PMDG birds.