Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Wennerholm

Advanced Fighter Jet

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Wenholt said:

What aircraft do you want PMDG to create?

MD-11 *_* 

 

(won‘t happen either) 


,

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Wenholt said:

Thank´s! I will take a look att DCS. I am very demanding when it comes to my hangar.

no problem, I think you will like it. 


Mike Avallone

9900k@5.0,Corsair H115i cooler,ASUS 2080TI,GSkill 32GB pc3600 ram, 2 WD black NVME ssd drives, ASUS maximus hero MB

 

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Wenholt said:

henry, I wrote  "P3D Prof". Maybe you not understand the abbreviation "P3D Prof". Just ask me, I can help you understand;-) The Superbug seams to compatible with Academic licens only.

No sir, I misread your post and my post was a misunderstanding. You are all good. BTW, check out DCS as suggested.

The extent of simulations is "in theatre" combat ops so don't expect good ATC or AI traffic. But the aircraft modeling is a very high quality.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Wenholt said:

What aircraft do you want PMDG to create?

Stick with tube liners.  If you want a study level fighter why in the world would you want it in P3D? DCS world is made for fighters.

  • Upvote 1

Pete Richards

Aussie born, Sydney (YSSY) living in Whitehorse, Yukon (CYXY)

Windows 11 Pro loaded on a Sabrent 1TB Rocket Nvme PCIe 4.0, Ryzen 9 7950x3d, MSI X670-Pro Wifi Motherboard, MSI RTX 4070 Ti Ventus 3X 12G OC, 64GB DDR5-6000 C30 Corsair Vengeance, 2x 1TB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe for MSFS2020, 4TB Seagate BarraCuda HD, Corsair RMx 1000W PSU, NZXT Kraken X63 280mm AIO, Phanteks P600S Case.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
4 hours ago, jrgaz said:

Lighten up dude.

No need for that, Kyle was attempting to explain the reason behind you misunderstanding the situation. Unless your post was a joke that he didn’t catch, I see no reason for you to tell him to “lighten up”. We’re all friends here, after all!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Wenholt said:

Go for Profit is good thing.

Profit is indeed a good thing, it keeps businesses afloat after all, but weren’t you just accusing VRS of making the superbug for one version just as a cash grab?

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Wenholt said:

I do not know. Therefore I suggest marketing investigation as we always do in my company before we create a new service for customers.

As stated before, the amount of customers using the forum is a small minority of their customer base and does not provide accurate or reliable marketing data as to how many people will buy a product, just ask the OPs of every thread requesting they bring the MD-11 back:laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Wenholt said:

What aircraft do you want PMDG to create?

As stated above, an MD11:biggrin:

Failing that, a 787 would be nice. I would’ve said the Max but, well, RSR took care of that already...

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post

Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t data and documentation be extremely hard, or even impossible, to obtain? I wouldn’t think Lockheed or any other manufacturer would want a study level simulation of their latest and greatest jet available for anyone to buy. Wouldn’t such documentation be classified, anyways?

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
48 minutes ago, YukonPete said:

Stick with tube liners.  If you want a study level fighter why in the world would you want it in P3D? DCS world is made for fighters.

Simply stated, DCS world is a limited sim and does not come close to reflecting the total operations of a military combat pilot. Yes, it does what it does reasonably well but even Falcon BMS was a more complete combat sim.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
8 hours ago, Wenholt said:

Well, maybe I´m to rude. I work in the military security service. We are all a bit rude in that department;-) I may be interested in DSC. Is it a realistic platform or more like a toy? Do you talk about VRS F / A 18E?

Excuse me, but just because you're in a line of work, where it's part of the job to be firm, authoritative and (maybe) a bit harsh, doesn't leave you 'cart-blance' to act that way towards other people. Besides, there's a difference between being firm and direct, while still keeping the mutual respect and just being rude, arrogant and acting disrespectful.

8 hours ago, YukonPete said:

I am not interested in a PMDG fighter jet!

+1

  • Upvote 2

Best regards,
--Anders Bermann--
____________________
Scandinavian VA

Pilot-ID: SAS2471

Share this post


Link to post
14 hours ago, Wenholt said:

Well, maybe I´m to rude. I work in the military security service. We are all a bit rude in that department;-)

Real or simulated? I thought you said that you work for a company, not the government.


\Robert Hamlich/

 

Share this post


Link to post

Let's cut some of the side chatter out, please.

You all know me. I'm blunt. I appreciate bluntness elsewhere. Ken's commentary may be blunt, but I don't take it offensively (and most of you know that when I take issue with something, I'm usually one to address it myself).

I jumped in to remind people to use thread titles that make sense. Like it or not, this is a (semi-)public forum for others to participate in discussions. In order for that to happen, there is an implicit contract to use common languages (ideally English, but some require help in other languages, and there are usually a few other members who can assist with that). Part of the use of common languages is using that language in an accepted standard (to sense dropping grammatical the make ability structure breaks down <- dropping grammatical structure breaks down the ability to make sense). "Aviation Speak" for example, is a subset of English (kind of). A METAR might look like gibberish to a commoner (:tongue:), but to us, here, it's within the accepted standard because the majority of us can understand them.

So...when it comes to interaction here, keep it all in some form that is understandable to the audience here. Does that mean you need to have perfect grammar? No. Does it mean taking a moment to question whether or not something would make sense outside of your head? Absolutely.

Super simple stuff (thanks Oz).

  • Upvote 2

Kyle Rodgers

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...