Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ray Proudfoot

Why do yoke and throttle makers not use Hall Effect sensors?

Recommended Posts

Hall-effect sensors have been available for some time and their design makes them infinitely more reliable long term than potentiometers. I can understand in the cheap 'n cheeflul stuff like Saitek / Logitech they'll stick to pots and pretty poor quality ones at that. But by the time you're into spending several hundred pounds (PFC) then they should be mandatory.

Why then do all the manufacturers I've checked with still use pots even on kit costing several hundred pounds? It seems a bizarre decision.

Is it done for cost reasons or because hall-effect sensors are more difficult to build into a design? How expensive are they? Prohibitively it would seem if that's the reason but somehow I doubt it.

Call me cynical but maybe they want you to keep going back to them for repairs when the pots eventually fail as they invariably will do.

Happy to be corrected and educated on any aspect of this.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Ray (Cheshire, England).
System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke.
Cheadle Hulme Weather

Share this post


Link to post

I have the PFC  hall sensor yoke which is super.  Never a problem.  But the PFC throttle units are a God damn pain in the word not allowed.  The pontentiometers keep wearing out once every year and I end up having to send it away for repair.  

Share this post


Link to post

Erich,

For units that cost as much as those do that is quite frankly disgraceful. If anything the pots on the throttles will wear out even quicker. My Saitek yoke is fine after 9 years but both throttle quadrants have been replaced. Not bad for £50 units but PFC should hang their heads in shame.


Ray (Cheshire, England).
System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke.
Cheadle Hulme Weather

Share this post


Link to post
13 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Erich,

For units that cost as much as those do that is quite frankly disgraceful. If anything the pots on the throttles will wear out even quicker. My Saitek yoke is fine after 9 years but both throttle quadrants have been replaced. Not bad for £50 units but PFC should hang their heads in shame.

Ray, I am getting to the point where, if I have to send it back for another replacement card/pots/repair, I would have paid as much on cumulative repair and courier charges than I paid for the unit itself.  

I'm told its easy to repair it - perhaps I should learn how.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Erich,

If it was me I'd be finding out the address of the CEO and writing a very stern letter. Maybe you were unlucky once but multiple times? I can't buy that.


Ray (Cheshire, England).
System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke.
Cheadle Hulme Weather

Share this post


Link to post

I have worked in electronics for my entire career as a tech and a trainer. If a manufacturer can save 2 cents on a product, many times they will do that rather than spend a few centsmore for reliability and accuracy. I have a T16000M Joystick now with hall effect IC's, and they are fantastic. I would not purchase any expensive controller that still uses pots. 

  • Like 1

 

BOBSK8             MSFS 2020 ,    ,PMDG 737-600-800 FSLTL , TrackIR ,  Avliasoft EFB2  ,  ATC  by PF3  ,

A Pilots LIfe V2 ,  CLX PC , Auto FPS, ACTIVE Sky FS,  PMDG DC6 , A2A Comanche, Fenix A320, Milviz C 310

 

Share this post


Link to post

Where PFC really should hang their heads is the cost of repairing the item (its almost the same as buying a new product from them).  I bought a defective yoke from them and sent it back 3 times before they could get it right, and I had to pay for shipping both ways on top of the repair costs.  While their products are well built for the most part, and will last for eons to come, they certainly do not entice simulation enthusiast to come back for upgrades or re-purchase.

The only time I will purchase stuff from PFC is if I am doing a professional build for a client.

PFC however, does offer hall effect sensors in their yokes (but you must specify when placing your order -which can now be done online), not sure about the throttle quads and rudder pedals.  Another solution is a fairly new competitor VirtualFly, makers of the Yoko yoke and throttle quadrants and they use hall effect sensors.  The price range is comparable to PFC's, and I think that the quality is just as good or even better.  MFG Crosswinds also makes a set of rudder pedals which has gotten rave reviews among the flight simulation community as well, and they to if I am not mistaken use hall effect sensors.

 

Cheers

  • Like 1

KROSWYND    a.k.a KILO_WHISKEY
Majestic Software Development/Support
Banner_MJC8.png

Sys 1:  AMD 7950X3D, NOCTUA D15S, Gigabyte Elite B650, MSI 4090, 64Gb Ram, Corsair 850 Power Supply, 2x2TB M.2 Samsung 980s, 1x4TB WDD M.2, 6xNoctua 120mm case fans, LG C2 55" OLED running at 120Hz for the monitor, Win11. Sys 2:  i7 8700k, MSI GAMING MBoard, 32Gigs RAM, MSI 4070Ti & EVGA 1080Ti. Hardware:  Brunner CLS-E-NG Yoke, Fulcrum One yoke, TM TPR Rudder Pedals, Yoko TQ6+ NEO, StreamDeck, Tobii Eye Tracker, Virpil VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Base with a TM grip
SIMULATORS: MSFS2020/XP12/P3D v5.4 & v6:  YouTube Videos

Share this post


Link to post

Bob,

It's a pity we can't use the power of AvSim to put the message out to manufacturers that we won't tolerate pots except on the cheapest hardware.

When you consider how much Erich has spent on PFC kit it's an absolute disgrace how many times PFC pots have failed.

Why can't people like Honeycomb see that if they put hall-effect sensors in their upcoming kit they could corner the market. I cannot understand their mentality, I really can't.

  • Like 2

Ray (Cheshire, England).
System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke.
Cheadle Hulme Weather

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, crosswind said:

PFC however, does offer hall effect sensors in their yokes (but you must specify when placing your order -which can now be done online), not sure about the throttle quads and rudder pedals. 

I have the hall effect sensors in my Yoke.  I specifically wanted that.  Unfortunately (4 years on),  it's still not an option for the throttle units)

I have fortunately found a local PFC distributor in the UK who has replaced a Windows 7 compatible circuit board with a W10 board and replaced the potentiometers.  Otherwise it would be a dud unit.  I certainly wouldn't return it to the US.  The local distributor says PFC  are quite bad with service generally - and has also alluded to the fact that the quality of their builds is not always consistent.  I do however really like the look and feel of the throttle units, especially as the units are interchangeable for the different types of aircraft you fly

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, crosswind said:

Yoko yoke and throttle quadrants

Maybe its just me but I can't take a product seriously if it's called 'Yoko' the yoke  and 'Ruddo' the rudder.  My custom was lost based purely on that silly nomenclature.   

Share this post


Link to post

There's more to the equation than pots vs. HE Sensors... the design and manufacturing of the controller.  Good quality pots will survive well in a product built to reasonably tight tolerances and good manufacturing practices (although HE Sensors are always preferred).  Point being... even the best quality HE Sensor will quickly be trashed by a poorly designed and/or built controller.  And therein lies the problem in the flightsim controller biz... quality vs. cost = too many people dealing with failing controllers.

Before committing to pots or HE Sensors the first priority should be the quality of the controller.

Greg

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post

Almost $1000 for a yoke with potentiometers   Wow, now i have heard everything. 


 

BOBSK8             MSFS 2020 ,    ,PMDG 737-600-800 FSLTL , TrackIR ,  Avliasoft EFB2  ,  ATC  by PF3  ,

A Pilots LIfe V2 ,  CLX PC , Auto FPS, ACTIVE Sky FS,  PMDG DC6 , A2A Comanche, Fenix A320, Milviz C 310

 

Share this post


Link to post
11 minutes ago, lownslo said:

There's more to the equation than pots vs. HE Sensors... the design and manufacturing of the controller.  Good quality pots will survive well in a product built to reasonably tight tolerances and good manufacturing practices (although HE Sensors are always preferred).  Point being... even the best quality HE Sensor will quickly be trashed by a poorly designed and/or built controller.  And therein lies the problem in the flightsim controller biz... quality vs. cost = too many people dealing with failing controllers.

Before committing to pots or HE Sensors the first priority should be the quality of the controller.

Greg

PFC controllers was about the best you could buy 4 years ago.  - that's what I thought.  After watching Word Not Allowed's  EDIT: (No idea why his name is not allowed) video on the Throttle unit I decided to get one.

9 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

Almost $1000 for a yoke with potentiometers   Wow, now i have heard everything. 

No, the Yoke has Hall Effect sensors.  The Throttle Unit has potentiometers.

Share this post


Link to post

There are a couple of notable off-the-shelf units that do use HE transducers--on the inexpensive end, the Thrustmaster T16000M (~$50), a plastic consumer gaming stick (which can easily be set up for left-handed use, i.e. as a Scarebus Captain's sidestick) which has HE sensing on the aileron/elevator stick axes, but *not* on the throttle.  In the mid-range is the Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog, a sturdy all-metal A-10 replica stick and throttle combo with HE sensors on the aileron/elevator and also on both throttle axes (~$400).  On the high end are the PFC yokes, which use HE sensors on the aileron/elevator axes, but nothing else (~$1200).  I don't know of any stock rudder pedal units that use HE transducers.

About 5 years ago I did a custom retrofit of my 2002-vintage PFC yoke/throttle/rudder setup and replaced all of the position transducers with HE sensors, which connect to the PC via one of several Leo Bodnar BU0836X USB interface boards.  It was a real project, especially the throttle quad, as I could not find any sort of linear HE-based slider that would work as a drop-in replacement for the slide pots.  I ended up fabricating a set of brass piers that hold rare earth magnets over each end of the pot slider's travel, and I placed an Allegro A1321 HE chip on an extension to the slider lever so that the HE sensor moves between the magnets together with the pot slider.  I had to write custom driver software to take the nonlinear output from the sensor and transform it to a linear position value.  The yoke was easier--the pots were replaced with Honeywell rotary HE transducers, which are electrically linear and a close physical match to the original rotary pot, although it required rewiring the yoke because the HE transducers use a three-wire connection instead of the simple two-wire setup for the original pots.  The PFC rudder mod uses a 3/4" cube Neodymium magnet mounted on the crossbar with a HE sensor mounted just above it to measure the angular rotation (it's pretty linear across the limited pedal throw, so it calibrated directly).  I glued 1/4" diameter neodymium disc magnets to the bottoms of the 1/4" diameter brake shafts and replaced the brake axis on/off switches with an A1321 sensor--very nonlinear and requires the output to be transformed as well.  It's not a project for the timid, but it's been awesome and worth the trouble ever since. 

Yes, it sure would be nice if there were a no-fuss commercial version out there...

Regards

  • Like 3

Bob Scott | President and CEO, AVSIM Inc
ATP Gulfstream II-III-IV-V

System1 (P3Dv5/v4): i9-13900KS @ 6.0GHz, water 2x360mm, ASUS Z790 Hero, 32GB GSkill 7800MHz CAS36, ASUS RTX4090
Samsung 55" JS8500 4K TV@30Hz,
3x 2TB WD SN850X 1x 4TB Crucial P3 M.2 NVME SSD, EVGA 1600T2 PSU, 1.2Gbps internet
Fiber link to Yamaha RX-V467 Home Theater Receiver, Polk/Klipsch 6" bookshelf speakers, Polk 12" subwoofer, 12.9" iPad Pro
PFC yoke/throttle quad/pedals with custom Hall sensor retrofit, Thermaltake View 71 case, Stream Deck XL button box

Sys2 (MSFS/XPlane): i9-10900K @ 5.1GHz, 32GB 3600/15, nVidia RTX4090FE, Alienware AW3821DW 38" 21:9 GSync, EVGA 1000P2
Thrustmaster TCA Boeing Yoke, TCA Airbus Sidestick, 2x TCA Airbus Throttle quads, PFC Cirrus Pedals, Coolermaster HAF932 case

Portable Sys3 (P3Dv4/FSX/DCS): i9-9900K @ 5.0 Ghz, Noctua NH-D15, 32GB 3200/16, EVGA RTX3090, Dell S2417DG 24" GSync
Corsair RM850x PSU, TM TCA Officer Pack, Saitek combat pedals, TM Warthog HOTAS, Coolermaster HAF XB case

Share this post


Link to post

Virtual Fly will be offering all there controllers with Hall-effect sensors sometime this year rumor has it. I also heard that it should be easy to swap out the pots with the new Hall-effect sensors when the time comes when mine ware out.

 

Edited by FreeBird(Josh)
  • Upvote 1

CPU: Intel i9-11900K @5.2 / RAM: 32GB DDR4 3200 / GPU: 4080 16GB /

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...