Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
KrisJ

757 retirement - Boeing’s significant mistake?

Recommended Posts

As we now have P3D4 Ready 757 I am interested in others opinion. In the light of a middle of the market discussion, was this the best decision to made considering the gap Boeing has today? I remember their statement that days that they discontinue 757 program as it would create internal competition with 737-900. However today we now that this  airframe, as well as longest MAX,  is unable to further develop into MoM nor to compete with A321LR.

The 757 had all its advantages to further develop that 737 hasnt. Mainly engine clrearance, size. Just wondering how much Opportunity was possible to achive on 757 if equipment with new engines, awionics, materials and other technologies.

Looking forward for your views.

Kris

 

Share this post


Link to post

Boeing's old concept of Yellowstone Project was supposed to be developed in three phases Y1, Y2, Y3, and this was supposed to entirely replace the 7x7 series with a modern fleet, unfortunately only Y2 has been developed into the 787 and Y1 and Y3 has been canceled as they have just updated the 737 and 777 instead because it was cheaper, this falls short of where they should be with a modern fleet.

The 787 (Y2) was the first and should have been called something else other then a '7' series aircraft, this latest in Boeing Technology is named after 1960's numbering, that was a mistake.

The Y1 project was supposed to replace the 737 and 757 with an entirely new air frame similar to the 787 but smaller, this was cancelled because it is cheaper to modify a 737 into a 737 MAX X

The Y3 project was supposed to replace the 747 and 777 with an entirely new air frame similar to the 787 but larger, this was cancelled because it is cheaper to modify a 777 into a 777 MAX X

757 is in my opinion the best 7-Series ever produced, and yes they probably took it out of production too soon. they could have also MAXed it as well considering they won't be doing a Y1 or Y3 anymore. I would have liked to see a 757 MAX X because in my view the 737 MAX 10 falls short, a 757 MAX would have been better.

With the cancellation of Y1 and Y3 the modernization of Boeing is a very big let down, they have done the band aid solution instead of a total overhaul of the fleet.

 

Edited by Matthew Kane
  • Like 6

Matthew Kane

 

Share this post


Link to post

Thanks Matthew - I learned something today.

Franklin Duncan

 

  • Upvote 1

Franklin Duncan

Share this post


Link to post

I also agree that Boeing should redesign the 757 into a 757 MAX. The 757 is a fantastic aircraft and with updated aerodynamics, materials, engines, and avionics it could well become the best middle of the market aircraft out there. 

Boeing is contemplating developing a brand new MoM aircraft dubbed the 797, which sounds really cool. However, this will take many years and a huge amount of money to accomplish. They already have a great template for one in the 757 and they should take advantage of it.

Dave

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Simulator: P3Dv5.4

System Specs: Intel i7 13700K CPU, MSI Mag Z790 Tomahawk Motherboard, 32GB DDR5 6000MHz RAM, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Video Card, 3x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro M.2 2280 SSDs, Windows 11 Home OS

 

Share this post


Link to post

It'd probably cost Boeing as much to build an upgraded 757 as a completely new jet, as the 757 assembly line was taken down something like 14 years ago, in 2004.

Production lines are kept going by orders, and as I recall, the 757 wasn't 'zackly bringing 'em in during the 1999-2001 tech wreck and then the bottom really dropped out in the airline depression post-9/11.  When the decision was made to shut down the line, probably sometime in the 2002-2003 timeframe, demand had evaporated and the sort of technology leaps that the 737 MAX incorporates were still a decade away.

Y'know what they say..."you can never go back."

Regards

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Bob Scott | President and CEO, AVSIM Inc
ATP Gulfstream II-III-IV-V

System1 (P3Dv5/v4): i9-13900KS @ 6.0GHz, water 2x360mm, ASUS Z790 Hero, 32GB GSkill 7800MHz CAS36, ASUS RTX4090
Samsung 55" JS8500 4K TV@30Hz,
3x 2TB WD SN850X 1x 4TB Crucial P3 M.2 NVME SSD, EVGA 1600T2 PSU, 1.2Gbps internet
Fiber link to Yamaha RX-V467 Home Theater Receiver, Polk/Klipsch 6" bookshelf speakers, Polk 12" subwoofer, 12.9" iPad Pro
PFC yoke/throttle quad/pedals with custom Hall sensor retrofit, Thermaltake View 71 case, Stream Deck XL button box

Sys2 (MSFS/XPlane): i9-10900K @ 5.1GHz, 32GB 3600/15, nVidia RTX4090FE, Alienware AW3821DW 38" 21:9 GSync, EVGA 1000P2
Thrustmaster TCA Boeing Yoke, TCA Airbus Sidestick, 2x TCA Airbus Throttle quads, PFC Cirrus Pedals, Coolermaster HAF932 case

Portable Sys3 (P3Dv4/FSX/DCS): i9-9900K @ 5.0 Ghz, Noctua NH-D15, 32GB 3200/16, EVGA RTX3090, Dell S2417DG 24" GSync
Corsair RM850x PSU, TM TCA Officer Pack, Saitek combat pedals, TM Warthog HOTAS, Coolermaster HAF XB case

Share this post


Link to post

Very interesting observations. I wonder if Boeing may have done well to keep the 717 in production with upgrades for the RJ market. They seem to be uninterested in that arena. Maybe they could have added winglets and other modifications to make it more economical.  Love all the DC9 based aircraft. I know it was not their design originally but they own it now.


Vic green

Share this post


Link to post

Why not just "Buy" a RJ division!

 

Boeing to take over $4.75 billion Embraer unit, targeting Airbus-Bombardier

Share this post


Link to post
23 minutes ago, PATCO LCH said:

Very interesting observations. I wonder if Boeing may have done well to keep the 717 in production with upgrades for the RJ market. They seem to be uninterested in that arena. Maybe they could have added winglets and other modifications to make it more economical.  Love all the DC9 based aircraft. I know it was not their design originally but they own it now.

This model was in direct competition with the 737 when Boeing bought McDonnell-Douglas at that time and to me that explains why the life of the MD-95 (or 717 in Boeing's) was so short. Now the situation with the 757 is different, considering the replacement alternatives in Boeing are not good enough as demonstrated by the low market response.

Cheers, Ed


Cheers, Ed

MSFS Steam - Win10 Home x64 // Rig: Corsair Graphite 760T Full Tower - ASUS MBoard Maximus XII Hero Z490 - CPU Intel i9-10900K - 64GB RAM - MSI RTX2080 Super 8GB - [1xNVMe M.2 1TB + 1xNVMe M.2 2TB (Samsung)] + [1xSSD 1TB + 1xSSD 2TB (Crucial)] + [1xSSD 1TB (Samsung)] + 1 HDD Seagate 2TB + 1 HDD Seagate External 4TB - Monitor LG 29UC97C UWHD Curved - PSU Corsair RM1000x - VR Oculus Rift // MSFS Steam - Win 10 Home x64 - Gaming Laptop CUK ASUS Strix - CPU Intel i7-8750H - 32GB RAM - RTX2070 8GB - SSD 2TB + HDD 2TB // Thrustmaster FCS & MS XBOX Controllers

Share this post


Link to post

I agree with Mathew.  the 757 was one of the most comfortable airliners I've ever flown in and handled chop very well   I for one was sad to see Boeing discontinue the production.,

 

  • Upvote 1

Thank you.

Rick

 $Silver Donor

EAA 1317610   I7-7700K @ 4.5ghz, MSI Z270 Gaming MB,  32gb 3200,  Geforce RTX2080 Super O/C,  28" Samsung 4k Monitor,  Various SSD, HD, and peripherals

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

With regards to 717, airlines would by it today if available, at least its what they say. In fact a second hand 717 is worth as a gold today.

Coming back to 757. I disagree that returning production line back and upgrading the plane to MAX will cost as much as clean sheet design. You have core design made and tested, you have production knowledge, practice and at least part of equipment already in place. Its still huge investment but for sure small part of the new plane one.

Share this post


Link to post
3 hours ago, Adrian123 said:

Why not just "Buy" a RJ division!

 

Boeing to take over $4.75 billion Embraer unit, targeting Airbus-Bombardier

They have to get that past the Brazilian Government agreeing to such a deal. Still a very good chance they will not agree on a deal because it means selling 80% of a Brazilian Asset to a foreign company. The Brazilian Government is very patriotic, it will be a challenge to get past that. 

Difference between Embraer deal and Bombardier deal is Bombardier only sold one of their aircraft lines to Airbus with agreements to continue to manufacture, this was very strategic but Canada gets to keep Bombardier. the Embraer deal means they are selling 80% of the company to Boeing, very different kind of deal. Will the Brazilian Government agree that is in the best interest of the Brazilian People? We will see.


Matthew Kane

 

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...